G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
97 Valid Reviews
The Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.19% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
30 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 30 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 86.67% and is based on 30 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.60%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Len Cons | 7/10 | 616 days | 96% |
| Caron | 10/10 | 647 days | 100% |
| Virginie | 7/10 | 676 days | 90% |
| Mikael Warner | 9/10 | 707 days | 93% |
| Rian Caccianiga | 7/10 | 768 days | 81% |
| Kelly | 9/10 | 799 days | 83% |
| Giani | 10/10 | 829 days | 80% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 982 days | 60% |
| Mickey Smillie | 9/10 | 1041 days | 52% |
| Charles Vaughan | 10/10 | 1164 days | 39% |
| Fernando | 10/10 | 1225 days | 33% |
| Lunar Orbit | 9/10 | 1406 days | 19% |
| Anna Swain | 10/10 | 1590 days | 11% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1621 days | 10% |
| Dan | 10/10 | 1621 days | 10% |
| Marg Dale | 7/10 | 1621 days | 9% |
| Kerry | 10/10 | 1712 days | 7% |
| Chris Harding | 9/10 | 1743 days | 7% |
| Maree | 9/10 | 2016 days | 6% |
| Ian & Wendy | 10/10 | 2108 days | 6% |
| Alex Tikonoff | 9/10 | 2168 days | 5% |
| Ancient Uncle | 6/10 | 2260 days | 5% |
| D and I singh | 10/10 | 2352 days | 5% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 2413 days | 5% |
| Tam | 5/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
| Snips | 9/10 | 2564 days | 4% |
| Regina | 8/10 | 2564 days | 4% |
| Keilani | 10/10 | 2625 days | 4% |
| ian kennedy | 9/10 | 2625 days | 4% |
| Daphne H | 9/10 | 2655 days | 4% |
| Caity | 10/10 | 2747 days | 4% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 2778 days | 4% |
| Emma Medina | 10/10 | 2864 days | 4% |
| Jim Bass | 9/10 | 2867 days | 4% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2953 days | 3% |
| Paul Smith | 7/10 | 3232 days | 3% |
| James Braithwaite | 9/10 | 3239 days | 3% |
| Saskia Ruttor | 9/10 | 3323 days | 3% |
| Mark Johnston | 9/10 | 3334 days | 2% |
| Stephanie Oliver | 7/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Jude and Chris | 10/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
| Justyna Blajerska | 5/10 | 3545 days | 1% |
| Sharon | 9/10 | 3550 days | 2% |
| Casa Tone | 9/10 | 3555 days | 2% |
| Julia Clearwater | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
| Heather Peart | 10/10 | 3628 days | 2% |
| Sally Young | 10/10 | 3659 days | 2% |
| Norbert Dekker Kleijn | 8/10 | 3690 days | 2% |
| Denelle Coutts | 10/10 | 3740 days | 1% |
| Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 3750 days | 1% |
| J V Henare | 7/10 | 3840 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 9/10 | 3872 days | 1% |
| Matt Betts | 8/10 | 3879 days | 1% |
| Colin Petherbridge | 8/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
| Dani Bummler | 2/10 | 3987 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4239 days | 0% |
| Dusty Miller | 9/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 4277 days | 0% |
| Andrew Luke | 9/10 | 4314 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 7/10 | 4420 days | 1% |
| David Wood | 9/10 | 4451 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 8/10 | 4543 days | 1% |
| Eddie | 8/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
| Schuster | 10/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
| Steven Wood | 8/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
| Hans | 10/10 | 4745 days | 1% |
| Claudia Mueller | 9/10 | 4760 days | 1% |
| Lotte Uneken | 10/10 | 4767 days | 1% |
| Helmut Schmid | 7/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Hanna_Malte | 9/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
| Romla | 7/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
| Ronald Veldman | 7/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
| Susie Christensen | 9/10 | 5045 days | 1% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 8/10 | 5364 days | 1% |
| Chris Ashton | 8/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
| Roman & Esther | 10/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| Shirley | 9/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
| Berger | 8/10 | 5400 days | 1% |
| Chris White | 7/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Peter & Margo Boullin | 10/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Simon Vallis | 9/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| nosey | 8/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
| Alan & Lorna | 8/10 | 5754 days | 1% |
| John N | 8/10 | 5755 days | 1% |
| Ivo Braakhuis | 8/10 | 5769 days | 1% |
| Regina Giger | 10/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| Nick | 8/10 | 5788 days | 1% |
| Taya Cross | 9/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
| EA Anders | 9/10 | 5806 days | 1% |
| Werner Swiss | 10/10 | 5811 days | 1% |
| Dawn Campbell | 8/10 | 5820 days | 1% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 5834 days | 1% |
| dirkdev | 8/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Ulyate | 7/10 | 5862 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.13% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.