Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mueller Hut Route.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
74 Valid Reviews
The Mueller Hut Route experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 38 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route valid reviews is 90.81% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
72 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 72 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route face-to-face reviews is 90.56% and is based on 72 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.16%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therese Kacsics | 10/10 | 2760 days | 100% |
| Tomas Kotul | 9/10 | 3200 days | 71% |
| Madi | 10/10 | 3263 days | 68% |
| Kosia | 10/10 | 3263 days | 68% |
| Petr Jesko | 10/10 | 3274 days | 67% |
| Sandra Piechoua | 10/10 | 3274 days | 67% |
| Isabel | 9/10 | 3511 days | 52% |
| Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3511 days | 52% |
| Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3517 days | 51% |
| Mark Ryan | 10/10 | 3518 days | 52% |
| Marla | 7/10 | 3520 days | 48% |
| Matthias Hottex | 10/10 | 3523 days | 52% |
| Valerie Pauly | 7/10 | 3523 days | 48% |
| Jan Sojka | 10/10 | 3523 days | 52% |
| Denisa Tuckova | 10/10 | 3523 days | 52% |
| Daniel Weber | 7/10 | 3530 days | 47% |
| Szu-Yi Hsu | 9/10 | 3534 days | 50% |
| Chao Lai | 9/10 | 3534 days | 50% |
| Derick Trotter | 9/10 | 3535 days | 50% |
| Molly Bogeberg | 10/10 | 3538 days | 51% |
| Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3539 days | 50% |
| Lauren Goebel | 10/10 | 3544 days | 50% |
| Leon Schotter | 10/10 | 3545 days | 50% |
| Ellie Doughty | 8/10 | 3546 days | 49% |
| Lukas Havlicek | 9/10 | 3548 days | 49% |
| Regina Baum | 8/10 | 3548 days | 49% |
| Florian Baum | 10/10 | 3548 days | 50% |
| Joaquin Gruffat | 9/10 | 3550 days | 49% |
| Isaliner and Mathieu | 10/10 | 3555 days | 50% |
| Matt and Louise | 10/10 | 3598 days | 47% |
| Lenka Korinkova | 10/10 | 3897 days | 28% |
| Jiri Benda | 10/10 | 3897 days | 28% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 3969 days | 23% |
| Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 3984 days | 22% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4241 days | 6% |
| Simeon W | 10/10 | 4257 days | 5% |
| Stina Hultberg | 10/10 | 4279 days | 4% |
| Hadar | 10/10 | 4279 days | 4% |
| Linus Larsson | 6/10 | 4281 days | 3% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 9/10 | 4292 days | 3% |
| Daniel Naveh | 10/10 | 4323 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 4324 days | 1% |
| Guy David | 7/10 | 4324 days | 1% |
| Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 4324 days | 1% |
| Maya Barad | 9/10 | 4324 days | 1% |
| Sarah Strong | 10/10 | 4327 days | 1% |
| Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
| Omri Ifrsh | 10/10 | 4615 days | 30% |
| Pete Wilson | 9/10 | 4626 days | 29% |
| Tim Vennewold | 9/10 | 4627 days | 29% |
| Yves Vennewald | 10/10 | 4627 days | 30% |
| Pia Pitkala | 9/10 | 4629 days | 29% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 4649 days | 29% |
| Katharina Littlemann | 10/10 | 4652 days | 30% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 8/10 | 4661 days | 29% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 4992 days | 30% |
| Nicholas Prakenhammar | 7/10 | 5018 days | 27% |
| Jasmin Loeffler | 7/10 | 5316 days | 27% |
| Ofir Avimeir | 9/10 | 5349 days | 29% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5353 days | 30% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 5355 days | 30% |
| Chrissy Crebas | 10/10 | 5356 days | 30% |
| Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5374 days | 30% |
| Thomas Reidinger | 7/10 | 5385 days | 27% |
| Eduard Wikidal | 3/10 | 5386 days | 15% |
| Wallet | 8/10 | 5398 days | 29% |
| Victoria Slater | 8/10 | 5710 days | 29% |
| Franz | 10/10 | 5733 days | 30% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 8/10 | 5738 days | 29% |
| Matthias A | 9/10 | 5738 days | 29% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5819 days | 30% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 5887 days | 30% |
| SteveW | 8/10 | 6088 days | 29% |
| Francesca Sabat | 10/10 | 6092 days | 30% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mueller Hut Route does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.73% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.