Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for U Fly Extreme.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
U Fly Extreme
Valid Reviews
68 Valid Reviews
The U Fly Extreme experience has a total of 68 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
93% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme valid reviews is 99.12% and is based on 68 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
20 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 68 valid reviews, the experience has 20 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 20 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
75% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme face-to-face reviews is 97.00% and is based on 20 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
99.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Little | 10/10 | 3707 days | 67% |
| Dieter Schmees | 10/10 | 3730 days | 63% |
| Jonas Olsen | 10/10 | 3962 days | 37% |
| Alex Sheldon | 10/10 | 4049 days | 0% |
| Jeremy Maurer | 10/10 | 4114 days | 0% |
| Patrycja Polakowska | 10/10 | 4399 days | 35% |
| William Haynie | 10/10 | 4448 days | 60% |
| babune48 | 10/10 | 4509 days | 60% |
| jimmyviera | 10/10 | 4509 days | 60% |
| Shaktale | 10/10 | 4540 days | 60% |
| shaynelighty | 10/10 | 4540 days | 60% |
| tateyjnr | 10/10 | 4692 days | 60% |
| Rufus_Katz | 10/10 | 4754 days | 60% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 4758 days | 35% |
| hankharris | 10/10 | 4814 days | 60% |
| Swedes | 10/10 | 4845 days | 60% |
| Bastian_Heinz | 10/10 | 4845 days | 60% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 4935 days | 60% |
| Adam Duus-Boolsen | 9/10 | 5112 days | 34% |
| migraineur | 10/10 | 5148 days | 60% |
| ashafir | 10/10 | 5148 days | 60% |
| Mick Doherty | 10/10 | 5179 days | 60% |
| starkstromspielplatz | 10/10 | 5179 days | 60% |
| daw1906 | 10/10 | 5210 days | 60% |
| shehlit | 10/10 | 5210 days | 60% |
| kirstgb | 10/10 | 5271 days | 60% |
| slipsius | 10/10 | 5271 days | 60% |
| Timoe | 10/10 | 5300 days | 60% |
| ChunHow | 10/10 | 5300 days | 60% |
| dgavish | 10/10 | 5362 days | 60% |
| cam2004 | 10/10 | 5392 days | 60% |
| michael | 10/10 | 5392 days | 60% |
| Andrew Cooke | 10/10 | 5454 days | 60% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 5454 days | 60% |
| Ellie Parkes | 10/10 | 5513 days | 60% |
| sirstroh | 10/10 | 5513 days | 60% |
| Amanda Hoff | 10/10 | 5513 days | 60% |
| Polo | 10/10 | 5544 days | 60% |
| Mira | 10/10 | 5575 days | 60% |
| Bart de Jong | 10/10 | 5575 days | 60% |
| Vivienne O'Reilly | 9/10 | 5598 days | 34% |
| torandsimon | 10/10 | 5605 days | 60% |
| mzx2 | 10/10 | 5605 days | 60% |
| Claire Salter | 10/10 | 5636 days | 60% |
| NZJenJen | 10/10 | 5665 days | 60% |
| Aaron Farry | 10/10 | 5696 days | 60% |
| mayo | 10/10 | 5727 days | 60% |
| Jeremy | 8/10 | 5819 days | 33% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 5820 days | 60% |
| KjellR | 10/10 | 5821 days | 35% |
| CharityW | 9/10 | 5821 days | 34% |
| RichardA | 10/10 | 5826 days | 35% |
| Anne Hofer | 10/10 | 5856 days | 60% |
| crazyklaus | 10/10 | 5857 days | 60% |
| mash | 10/10 | 5864 days | 60% |
| Darroch Footprint Travel Guides | 10/10 | 5866 days | 60% |
| Jhon | 10/10 | 5868 days | 35% |
| davy | 10/10 | 5869 days | 60% |
| Timg | 10/10 | 5870 days | 35% |
| Oliver Hoppe | 10/10 | 5963 days | 60% |
| Sune | 9/10 | 6008 days | 34% |
| Christina Endicott | 10/10 | 6114 days | 35% |
| Brian Endicott | 10/10 | 6114 days | 35% |
| Katherine Humphrey | 10/10 | 6147 days | 35% |
| Phil Ritchie | 10/10 | 6163 days | 35% |
| Emma Parsons | 10/10 | 6163 days | 35% |
| Jenny Hancock | 10/10 | 6163 days | 35% |
| BCanuck | 10/10 | 6167 days | 60% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The U Fly Extreme experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 56 days. However the U Fly Extreme experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The U Fly Extreme experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.42% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.