Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Coachlines.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Abel Tasman Coachlines
Valid Reviews
59 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Coachlines experience has a total of 59 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 8 |
|
14% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Coachlines valid reviews is 74.58% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
59 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 59 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 8 |
|
14% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Coachlines face-to-face reviews is 74.58% and is based on 59 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
76.73%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barry Chantler | 8/10 | 4992 days | 96% |
| N Cowan | 9/10 | 5035 days | 98% |
| Maddy | 9/10 | 5392 days | 98% |
| Maxim van Schijndel | 8/10 | 5481 days | 96% |
| ruthh | 8/10 | 5491 days | 96% |
| Rachel Widerstrom | 8/10 | 5499 days | 96% |
| Daniel | 8/10 | 5720 days | 96% |
| Erin | 8/10 | 5764 days | 96% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5778 days | 98% |
| Tanja | 9/10 | 5778 days | 98% |
| Rachel | 6/10 | 5786 days | 70% |
| Liekens | 5/10 | 5834 days | 48% |
| martina | 8/10 | 5911 days | 96% |
| Rebecca Smith | 9/10 | 5929 days | 98% |
| dani smith | 9/10 | 5933 days | 98% |
| Cory Fusco | 7/10 | 5938 days | 85% |
| Danna | 7/10 | 5953 days | 85% |
| Helen | 9/10 | 5962 days | 98% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 6083 days | 96% |
| Toby | 6/10 | 6085 days | 70% |
| Kristin | 9/10 | 6089 days | 98% |
| Rob and Leo | 8/10 | 6090 days | 96% |
| Alexia | 8/10 | 6092 days | 96% |
| Jeanine | 9/10 | 6096 days | 98% |
| Mariah | 9/10 | 6097 days | 98% |
| Aiko Nishimura | 10/10 | 6100 days | 100% |
| Sanne Jonker | 9/10 | 6100 days | 98% |
| Renske Tehurne | 6/10 | 6104 days | 70% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6104 days | 100% |
| Paul McDonell | 10/10 | 6105 days | 100% |
| James Davies | 3/10 | 6105 days | 0% |
| Tess Tammer | 8/10 | 6105 days | 96% |
| Kristine Clemmensen Rotne | 4/10 | 6106 days | 24% |
| David | 5/10 | 6110 days | 48% |
| Kristine | 10/10 | 6110 days | 100% |
| Silvia | 5/10 | 6110 days | 48% |
| George Clark | 7/10 | 6110 days | 85% |
| Stephanie | 5/10 | 6125 days | 48% |
| Nick | 9/10 | 6127 days | 98% |
| Sebastian Bleck | 7/10 | 6128 days | 85% |
| Wayne Best | 7/10 | 6149 days | 85% |
| Jeroen | 8/10 | 6155 days | 96% |
| Paula Smith | 4/10 | 6156 days | 24% |
| Maria | 7/10 | 6156 days | 85% |
| Maruja | 8/10 | 6156 days | 96% |
| Julia | 8/10 | 6160 days | 96% |
| Jonathan | 5/10 | 6161 days | 48% |
| Samantha | 7/10 | 6182 days | 85% |
| Francesco | 10/10 | 6187 days | 100% |
| Rich | 8/10 | 6194 days | 96% |
| Dagmar | 5/10 | 6195 days | 48% |
| Gabriela Herger | 7/10 | 6195 days | 85% |
| Juliana | 3/10 | 6198 days | 0% |
| Carolr | 5/10 | 6202 days | 48% |
| Mary | 5/10 | 6203 days | 48% |
| Paulina | 7/10 | 6203 days | 85% |
| Eleanor Adams | 8/10 | 6205 days | 96% |
| George | 9/10 | 6429 days | 98% |
| Heather | 10/10 | 6450 days | 100% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Coachlines experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Abel Tasman Coachlines experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Coachlines experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
5.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.