Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Auckland Museum.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Auckland Museum
Valid Reviews
128 Valid Reviews
The Auckland Museum experience has a total of 128 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 128 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 37 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
80.94% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Auckland Museum valid reviews is 80.94% and is based on 128 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
116 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 128 valid reviews, the experience has 116 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 116 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 32 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
80.69% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Auckland Museum face-to-face reviews is 80.69% and is based on 116 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
81.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Faasser | 9/10 | 2575 days | 100% |
| Jeff Greenstreet | 9/10 | 2608 days | 98% |
| Julia Achatz | 5/10 | 2853 days | 65% |
| Daniela Hintermayr | 5/10 | 2867 days | 64% |
| Thomas Simeon | 8/10 | 2907 days | 81% |
| Kallan Mrozek | 8/10 | 2909 days | 81% |
| Tim | 7/10 | 2919 days | 76% |
| Jendrik | 7/10 | 2919 days | 76% |
| John Edwards | 8/10 | 2926 days | 80% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 3173 days | 67% |
| Benedikt Hang | 7/10 | 3181 days | 62% |
| Leon Grummer | 8/10 | 3193 days | 65% |
| Chris Cullen | 8/10 | 3198 days | 65% |
| Johannes Koch | 9/10 | 3202 days | 65% |
| Gerardo Furtado | 10/10 | 3205 days | 66% |
| Gabriela Cardoso | 10/10 | 3205 days | 66% |
| Chiara | 9/10 | 3207 days | 65% |
| Irene Marvelli | 7/10 | 3214 days | 61% |
| Mark White | 3/10 | 3214 days | 35% |
| Mikkel Pallesen | 6/10 | 3228 days | 55% |
| Maxima Buisan | 6/10 | 3229 days | 55% |
| Florian Mueller | 8/10 | 3233 days | 63% |
| Vincent | 5/10 | 3234 days | 49% |
| Tatiana | 10/10 | 3244 days | 64% |
| Christian Boudreau | 9/10 | 3261 days | 62% |
| Maria Ulitzsch | 6/10 | 3629 days | 36% |
| Leonie Moeller | 6/10 | 3897 days | 23% |
| Wolfgang and Christine | 8/10 | 3906 days | 26% |
| Agathe Dupuis | 9/10 | 3916 days | 26% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 3927 days | 25% |
| Serena Poggioli | 8/10 | 3942 days | 24% |
| Adrien Godeloup | 7/10 | 3976 days | 21% |
| hendrik king | 9/10 | 4161 days | 12% |
| Chantal Mortel | 7/10 | 4289 days | 5% |
| Maxime | 8/10 | 4296 days | 4% |
| Sebastian and Peter Beate | 10/10 | 4307 days | 4% |
| Timo Maschke | 10/10 | 4365 days | 1% |
| Jackie and Brian | 7/10 | 4366 days | 1% |
| Alexandra van den Brack | 8/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Benedicte and Mathilde Colas | 8/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| a a | 9/10 | 4464 days | 28% |
| Virgil Anabel | 9/10 | 4645 days | 28% |
| Mike Breele | 8/10 | 4649 days | 28% |
| Barry Baily | 9/10 | 4662 days | 28% |
| Lucie Rutherfurd | 9/10 | 4676 days | 28% |
| Lotte Foged | 9/10 | 4676 days | 28% |
| Nina Bille-Knudsen | 9/10 | 4749 days | 28% |
| Jack van den Nieuwendyk | 8/10 | 4751 days | 28% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 4998 days | 28% |
| Barry Digby | 1/10 | 5002 days | 11% |
| Fam de Kruyf | 8/10 | 5012 days | 28% |
| Jon_and_Family | 9/10 | 5015 days | 28% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 7/10 | 5018 days | 26% |
| Stephen Leitch | 8/10 | 5036 days | 28% |
| Richardr1 | 10/10 | 5297 days | 28% |
| Marcio Moretti | 9/10 | 5390 days | 28% |
| Fred Briggs | 9/10 | 5403 days | 28% |
| John Bost | 8/10 | 5403 days | 28% |
| willemrn | 7/10 | 5455 days | 26% |
| catdonjaime | 10/10 | 5463 days | 28% |
| Arran J | 10/10 | 5470 days | 28% |
| Anne Ford | 9/10 | 5472 days | 28% |
| David D S | 10/10 | 5478 days | 28% |
| Roman Hauri | 8/10 | 5482 days | 28% |
| Gensen | 7/10 | 5496 days | 26% |
| Suzanne | 8/10 | 5531 days | 28% |
| rita | 8/10 | 5578 days | 28% |
| arthurw | 10/10 | 5586 days | 28% |
| miniappleses | 9/10 | 5591 days | 28% |
| dieteru | 5/10 | 5714 days | 22% |
| LuukKarin | 8/10 | 5716 days | 28% |
| BrunoG | 9/10 | 5732 days | 28% |
| Pat | 8/10 | 5737 days | 28% |
| GH_Herrebrugh | 9/10 | 5754 days | 28% |
| EelcoK | 9/10 | 5756 days | 28% |
| Valerie | 9/10 | 5757 days | 28% |
| Christopher Gallaga | 1/10 | 5770 days | 11% |
| Bert | 9/10 | 5778 days | 28% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 5888 days | 28% |
| Michelle | 9/10 | 5888 days | 28% |
| Terneal King | 8/10 | 5952 days | 28% |
| Thomas Bachmann | 9/10 | 5962 days | 28% |
| Carmen | 10/10 | 5966 days | 28% |
| sasssy | 10/10 | 5987 days | 28% |
| Salome | 7/10 | 6021 days | 26% |
| Annie | 9/10 | 6084 days | 28% |
| Leanne Priestley | 10/10 | 6085 days | 28% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 6091 days | 28% |
| Thibault | 9/10 | 6093 days | 28% |
| Denise | 10/10 | 6097 days | 28% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 6097 days | 28% |
| Yayami Kimura | 10/10 | 6097 days | 28% |
| Tom | 8/10 | 6098 days | 28% |
| Sanne Jonker | 7/10 | 6101 days | 26% |
| Corina | 9/10 | 6105 days | 28% |
| Klaus | 9/10 | 6105 days | 28% |
| Tina Daly | 8/10 | 6106 days | 28% |
| Jo and Tony | 9/10 | 6106 days | 28% |
| Smith | 7/10 | 6107 days | 26% |
| Trinkler | 9/10 | 6107 days | 28% |
| Roger Repolusk | 8/10 | 6111 days | 28% |
| Carmen Dolny | 10/10 | 6115 days | 28% |
| Robert and Carol Rodgers | 10/10 | 6119 days | 28% |
| Roger and Heather Smith | 7/10 | 6119 days | 26% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 6126 days | 28% |
| Jim Curley | 10/10 | 6126 days | 28% |
| Reina Lohaye | 7/10 | 6129 days | 26% |
| Tim | 5/10 | 6154 days | 22% |
| Mum! | 8/10 | 6156 days | 28% |
| Nathalie Meunier | 9/10 | 6157 days | 28% |
| Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6161 days | 28% |
| Andrew Porter | 9/10 | 6162 days | 28% |
| Kay | 7/10 | 6185 days | 26% |
| Ann Westmacott | 8/10 | 6188 days | 28% |
| Abbey | 8/10 | 6198 days | 28% |
| Samuel Brejeon | 7/10 | 6199 days | 26% |
| Tom Clements | 7/10 | 6204 days | 26% |
| Christin | 6/10 | 6204 days | 25% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 6434 days | 28% |
| Yuki | 9/10 | 6437 days | 28% |
| Paola | 7/10 | 6454 days | 26% |
| Delgroot | 9/10 | 6472 days | 28% |
| Arjan | 7/10 | 6475 days | 26% |
| Lucy | 8/10 | 6477 days | 28% |
| delgroot | 8/10 | 6479 days | 28% |
| Frauke | 7/10 | 6486 days | 26% |
| Bernt | 6/10 | 6486 days | 25% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6504 days | 28% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Auckland Museum experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Auckland Museum experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Auckland Museum experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.87% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.