Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Swimming with Dolphins.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Swimming with Dolphins

Valid Reviews

60 Valid Reviews

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has a total of 61 reviews. There are 60 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 23
38%
9/10 12
20%
8/10 12
20%
7/10 10
17%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins valid reviews is 86.67% and is based on 60 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

53 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 60 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 11
21%
8/10 12
23%
7/10 9
17%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.66% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 85.66% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.19%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Isabel 4/10 3154 days 65%
Alix 10/10 3157 days 100%
Claire 10/10 3157 days 100%
Lena 7/10 3197 days 90%
Stefano 8/10 3224 days 93%
Ivan Dupont 7/10 3228 days 87%
Max Backelandt 7/10 3897 days 36%
Marie Toulemonde 8/10 3897 days 38%
Annika Marz 7/10 3910 days 35%
Julian Zeissler 7/10 3910 days 35%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 3915 days 34%
Barbara 10/10 3933 days 36%
Mark and Eefie 9/10 4358 days 0%
Nigel Leighton 10/10 4361 days 0%
Laura Diepeveen 8/10 4653 days 40%
Stam 8/10 4659 days 40%
cpope 10/10 4708 days 41%
Naomi Kosteaman 9/10 5018 days 40%
Samuel Prechel 9/10 5034 days 40%
Niels Van Welsenes 10/10 5042 days 41%
salsnz 10/10 5318 days 41%
Jvjm Family 6/10 5367 days 35%
Sinjc Grude 8/10 5404 days 40%
Rachel & Barak 9/10 5405 days 40%
Jeremy & Sarah Rind 10/10 5406 days 41%
Andreas Sterki 8/10 5477 days 40%
Gina Swindells 10/10 5480 days 41%
bogaard 9/10 5595 days 40%
Amy_B 10/10 5701 days 41%
NancyB 9/10 5701 days 40%
TraceyM 8/10 5701 days 40%
DanielGermany 6/10 5706 days 35%
AndreaT 10/10 5709 days 41%
Sue Green 10/10 5713 days 41%
Greg18 7/10 5713 days 38%
DavidJ 8/10 5720 days 40%
Stolz 10/10 5737 days 41%
LindaV 7/10 5747 days 38%
Ian 10/10 5762 days 41%
HelenUK 8/10 5763 days 40%
enthusejohn 10/10 5764 days 41%
Camilla E 9/10 5769 days 40%
Zoe Summers 10/10 5925 days 41%
Benjamin Throk 9/10 6092 days 40%
Marion 10/10 6093 days 41%
Maria Fahlander 7/10 6103 days 38%
Ellie 10/10 6106 days 41%
Sanne 8/10 6106 days 40%
Claire Masling 8/10 6113 days 40%
Sally and David Wallis 9/10 6113 days 40%
Jody 9/10 6125 days 40%
Eliase 7/10 6127 days 38%
Vicki Cook 9/10 6140 days 40%
Carola Haaparinne 10/10 6141 days 41%
Wayne Best 10/10 6149 days 41%
Martin Wright 10/10 6161 days 41%
Floren 9/10 6202 days 40%
Sebastian 8/10 6431 days 40%
Tracy 10/10 6476 days 41%
Jacobien 10/10 6483 days 41%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Swimming with Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.05% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Swimming with Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.99%
198 -4.01%
199 -4.03%
200 -4.05%
201 -4.07%
202 -4.09%
203 -4.11%

Balancing Adjustment

2.45% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.