G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
163 Valid Reviews
The AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy experience has a total of 165 reviews. There are 163 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 163 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 83 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.84% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy valid reviews is 91.84% and is based on 163 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
147 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 163 valid reviews, the experience has 147 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 147 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 76 |
|
52% |
| 9/10 | 37 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy face-to-face reviews is 92.04% and is based on 147 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.59%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewry | 8/10 | 2867 days | 100% |
| Allain Riepema | 10/10 | 2972 days | 95% |
| Lukas Tremel | 10/10 | 3234 days | 77% |
| Ferdinand Brunner | 10/10 | 3234 days | 77% |
| Eric | 10/10 | 3240 days | 76% |
| Moreno | 8/10 | 3293 days | 71% |
| Sabrina Kulikar | 10/10 | 3293 days | 73% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 3326 days | 71% |
| Hector | 10/10 | 3536 days | 56% |
| Carlos | 9/10 | 3536 days | 56% |
| gnkwvefvjpewyiiu | 9/10 | 3540 days | 55% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 8/10 | 3543 days | 55% |
| Wolfgang Ellenrieder | 8/10 | 3543 days | 55% |
| Patricia | 10/10 | 3545 days | 56% |
| Marla | 10/10 | 3545 days | 56% |
| Lærke Hagelskjær | 10/10 | 3561 days | 54% |
| Ruby Reynolds | 9/10 | 3564 days | 54% |
| Nancy Logan | 8/10 | 3573 days | 53% |
| Tomas Lloyd | 10/10 | 3581 days | 53% |
| Pernilla Therkildsen | 10/10 | 3593 days | 52% |
| Karina Therkildsen | 10/10 | 3593 days | 52% |
| Fero Saarinen | 9/10 | 3611 days | 51% |
| Rachael and Nik | 9/10 | 3613 days | 50% |
| Nicola Wiggan | 8/10 | 3642 days | 48% |
| Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3645 days | 45% |
| Gracen Verheryden | 10/10 | 3656 days | 48% |
| Katharina Block | 10/10 | 3925 days | 29% |
| Annika Fletemeyer | 10/10 | 3925 days | 29% |
| Shona MacDonald | 10/10 | 4266 days | 6% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 4266 days | 6% |
| Patricia Erni | 7/10 | 4278 days | 5% |
| Manuel Bleiker | 8/10 | 4278 days | 5% |
| Moritz Lepple | 10/10 | 4286 days | 5% |
| Jesper Henriksen | 8/10 | 4295 days | 4% |
| Helen McKevitt | 8/10 | 4306 days | 3% |
| Andrew Magill | 8/10 | 4306 days | 3% |
| Sophie Wolters | 7/10 | 4308 days | 3% |
| Mayan Goddat | 8/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Daniel Naveh | 10/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Stuart Wilson | 10/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
| Marla Fogh | 10/10 | 4648 days | 33% |
| Jitka Krejcova | 9/10 | 4651 days | 33% |
| Michal Sturma | 10/10 | 4651 days | 33% |
| Kletter | 9/10 | 4657 days | 33% |
| Postel Ge | 10/10 | 4657 days | 33% |
| Katey Justice | 8/10 | 4660 days | 33% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4660 days | 33% |
| Evelina Johansson | 10/10 | 4664 days | 33% |
| Sofia Anderson | 10/10 | 4664 days | 33% |
| Eric | 8/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
| Rogier Ramaker | 9/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
| Melvin Groenhof | 10/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4672 days | 33% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 8/10 | 4673 days | 33% |
| Harry Findeis | 9/10 | 4674 days | 33% |
| Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4675 days | 33% |
| Laura vanGool | 8/10 | 5015 days | 33% |
| Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| Robert & Bridget Holden | 10/10 | 5039 days | 33% |
| Erik Poirer | 10/10 | 5044 days | 33% |
| Rikke & Trine Bundgaard | 8/10 | 5044 days | 33% |
| Helen Chilton | 10/10 | 5047 days | 33% |
| Maximilian Heller | 10/10 | 5051 days | 33% |
| Andreas Kristiansen | 9/10 | 5053 days | 33% |
| Chris Marsh | 9/10 | 5056 days | 33% |
| Jessica Lane | 9/10 | 5056 days | 33% |
| Johan | 7/10 | 5057 days | 31% |
| Roberto Hallblom | 7/10 | 5057 days | 31% |
| Therese | 8/10 | 5057 days | 33% |
| karen_c | 10/10 | 5304 days | 33% |
| Sam papworth | 10/10 | 5364 days | 33% |
| Eva Chapron | 10/10 | 5364 days | 33% |
| Danny Connor | 10/10 | 5364 days | 33% |
| Josephine Hartley | 10/10 | 5364 days | 33% |
| Sean Brownell | 9/10 | 5365 days | 33% |
| Erin | 10/10 | 5387 days | 33% |
| Fabrizio Consolini | 8/10 | 5387 days | 33% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5394 days | 33% |
| Sofie Dubillot | 10/10 | 5399 days | 33% |
| Paap | 9/10 | 5401 days | 33% |
| Wouter Jansen | 10/10 | 5401 days | 33% |
| Charlie | 10/10 | 5410 days | 33% |
| Jol Balder | 9/10 | 5412 days | 33% |
| Nick Secker | 9/10 | 5414 days | 33% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 8/10 | 5414 days | 33% |
| Doris Schollenberger | 10/10 | 5414 days | 33% |
| Amanda Craig | 9/10 | 5418 days | 33% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5419 days | 33% |
| Lukis Haertel | 9/10 | 5421 days | 33% |
| Wallet | 9/10 | 5423 days | 33% |
| Theta | 9/10 | 5730 days | 33% |
| Jesper Sch | 9/10 | 5743 days | 33% |
| Inbar Yizhar Barnea | 8/10 | 5749 days | 33% |
| sasssy | 9/10 | 5761 days | 33% |
| Yasmin Abrahams | 9/10 | 5763 days | 33% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 5763 days | 33% |
| Huber | 10/10 | 5783 days | 33% |
| Chance McGuire | 10/10 | 5789 days | 33% |
| Irene Bech Ottesen | 10/10 | 5789 days | 33% |
| bobtravels | 9/10 | 5789 days | 33% |
| marcoswi | 10/10 | 5795 days | 33% |
| Samantha Williams | 10/10 | 5912 days | 33% |
| Adi | 10/10 | 6095 days | 33% |
| Paul | 9/10 | 6098 days | 33% |
| Enno Brehm | 8/10 | 6107 days | 33% |
| Jeremy652 | 8/10 | 6123 days | 33% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6130 days | 33% |
| RobC1 | 10/10 | 6130 days | 33% |
| RichardB1 | 10/10 | 6130 days | 33% |
| JoT | 10/10 | 6130 days | 33% |
| RobH | 10/10 | 6131 days | 33% |
| frisbeego | 9/10 | 6202 days | 33% |
| Con | 9/10 | 6213 days | 33% |
| jack | 9/10 | 6217 days | 33% |
| Rowan | 10/10 | 6240 days | 33% |
| Peter | 10/10 | 6270 days | 33% |
| David | 9/10 | 6272 days | 33% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6291 days | 33% |
| Christoffer | 10/10 | 6293 days | 33% |
| Jennie | 10/10 | 6301 days | 33% |
| Courtney | 10/10 | 6301 days | 33% |
| Zoe Summers | 10/10 | 6307 days | 33% |
| Martha | 9/10 | 6310 days | 33% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 6313 days | 33% |
| Simon | 2/10 | 6327 days | 14% |
| Leeanne Holland | 9/10 | 6349 days | 33% |
| Gorka Rojas | 10/10 | 6368 days | 33% |
| Sjoerd | 9/10 | 6370 days | 33% |
| Charlie Bond | 10/10 | 6377 days | 33% |
| Mike Dudey | 9/10 | 6377 days | 33% |
| Rachel | 9/10 | 6461 days | 33% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 6466 days | 33% |
| Tom Ben | 10/10 | 6466 days | 33% |
| Alex and Thomas | 8/10 | 6472 days | 33% |
| Anthony | 8/10 | 6475 days | 33% |
| Omer Harron | 9/10 | 6475 days | 33% |
| Richard Anthony | 9/10 | 6482 days | 33% |
| Neil | 10/10 | 6486 days | 33% |
| Omri Hasson | 10/10 | 6492 days | 33% |
| Nick | 10/10 | 6509 days | 33% |
| Matt Walker | 8/10 | 6509 days | 33% |
| Marc Hertogs | 8/10 | 6511 days | 33% |
| paulonline | 10/10 | 6513 days | 33% |
| Swen Schroder | 10/10 | 6535 days | 33% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6535 days | 33% |
| Kirsty Ranger | 8/10 | 6655 days | 33% |
| Ian Coldrake | 10/10 | 6662 days | 33% |
| Agnes | 10/10 | 6801 days | 33% |
| Billie | 10/10 | 6807 days | 33% |
| Michael | 9/10 | 6813 days | 33% |
| Michael | 9/10 | 6818 days | 33% |
| Andreas | 8/10 | 6821 days | 33% |
| Paul Yacoumis | 10/10 | 6823 days | 33% |
| Cat | 8/10 | 6825 days | 33% |
| IdanNakash | 10/10 | 6831 days | 33% |
| Martin Christina | 10/10 | 6831 days | 33% |
| sebastian | 9/10 | 6846 days | 33% |
| AndrewEwen | 10/10 | 6850 days | 33% |
| Kenneth | 7/10 | 6851 days | 31% |
| Andrew | 9/10 | 6851 days | 33% |
| MarcHarris | 9/10 | 6851 days | 33% |
| Traveller Girl | 5/10 | 8377 days | 25% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The AJ Hackett Nevis Bungy experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
1.21% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.