G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.07%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1361 days | 100% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 1908 days | 28% |
Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 2839 days | 17% |
Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 2856 days | 17% |
Monique | 10/10 | 2873 days | 17% |
Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 2893 days | 16% |
Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 2909 days | 16% |
Danny | 10/10 | 2923 days | 16% |
Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3161 days | 14% |
Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3161 days | 14% |
Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3166 days | 13% |
Navina | 7/10 | 3176 days | 13% |
Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3182 days | 13% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3195 days | 13% |
Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3197 days | 12% |
Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3216 days | 13% |
Dorothy | 10/10 | 3217 days | 13% |
Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3231 days | 13% |
Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3261 days | 12% |
KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3278 days | 12% |
Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3619 days | 8% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 3886 days | 5% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 3889 days | 5% |
Penny Lee | 7/10 | 3891 days | 5% |
Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 3891 days | 5% |
Ennico | 10/10 | 3930 days | 5% |
Becky Davis | 9/10 | 3945 days | 5% |
Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 3959 days | 5% |
Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4252 days | 1% |
Rainer | 9/10 | 4258 days | 1% |
Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4258 days | 1% |
Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4259 days | 1% |
Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4287 days | 1% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4287 days | 1% |
Raquel | 8/10 | 4290 days | 1% |
Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4290 days | 1% |
Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4291 days | 1% |
Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4309 days | 1% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4380 days | 6% |
Anna | 8/10 | 4615 days | 6% |
Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 4635 days | 6% |
Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 4643 days | 6% |
Richard Rite | 10/10 | 4644 days | 6% |
Alex Ross | 10/10 | 4644 days | 6% |
Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 4644 days | 6% |
sidcupjon | 9/10 | 4648 days | 6% |
kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 4648 days | 6% |
Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 4648 days | 6% |
Erik | 10/10 | 4650 days | 6% |
Brasier | 8/10 | 4654 days | 6% |
Harald | 8/10 | 4657 days | 6% |
Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 4658 days | 6% |
Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 4662 days | 6% |
Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 4662 days | 6% |
Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 4665 days | 6% |
John Hughes | 9/10 | 4669 days | 6% |
Louis Smit | 7/10 | 4672 days | 5% |
Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 4690 days | 5% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4708 days | 6% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 4748 days | 6% |
Josh | 9/10 | 4751 days | 6% |
jule | 10/10 | 4769 days | 6% |
Res Kormann | 8/10 | 4972 days | 6% |
David Taylor | 9/10 | 4988 days | 6% |
Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 4996 days | 6% |
Helen Evans | 9/10 | 4997 days | 6% |
Mark Vass | 8/10 | 4999 days | 6% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 4999 days | 6% |
Jacob | 8/10 | 5001 days | 6% |
Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5004 days | 6% |
Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5008 days | 6% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5008 days | 6% |
Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5011 days | 6% |
E C Frans | 10/10 | 5012 days | 6% |
Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5015 days | 6% |
Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5015 days | 6% |
Cesar | 9/10 | 5019 days | 6% |
Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5020 days | 6% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5021 days | 6% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5021 days | 6% |
Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5027 days | 5% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5027 days | 6% |
John Brand | 8/10 | 5028 days | 6% |
Andy | 7/10 | 5029 days | 5% |
Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5029 days | 6% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5030 days | 5% |
Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5032 days | 6% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5035 days | 6% |
Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5037 days | 6% |
Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5039 days | 6% |
Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5039 days | 6% |
Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5041 days | 6% |
mmallen | 10/10 | 5104 days | 6% |
alku83 | 10/10 | 5134 days | 6% |
KAA | 10/10 | 5165 days | 6% |
penz | 9/10 | 5257 days | 6% |
koster | 9/10 | 5313 days | 6% |
BelindaT | 10/10 | 5326 days | 6% |
nuwee | 10/10 | 5348 days | 6% |
Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5360 days | 6% |
Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5361 days | 5% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5365 days | 6% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5366 days | 6% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5379 days | 6% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5380 days | 6% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5385 days | 6% |
M Sicard | 7/10 | 5389 days | 5% |
John Helle | 9/10 | 5400 days | 6% |
Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5407 days | 6% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5413 days | 5% |
Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5416 days | 6% |
Arran J | 5/10 | 5438 days | 4% |
Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5438 days | 6% |
csziegler | 10/10 | 5453 days | 6% |
katharinatum | 9/10 | 5453 days | 6% |
marcol | 9/10 | 5454 days | 6% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5457 days | 6% |
martint | 10/10 | 5462 days | 6% |
koellner | 9/10 | 5467 days | 6% |
The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5469 days | 6% |
alasiac | 10/10 | 5469 days | 6% |
Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5471 days | 6% |
kencook | 10/10 | 5473 days | 6% |
Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5477 days | 6% |
Deede K | 8/10 | 5477 days | 6% |
Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5480 days | 6% |
Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5481 days | 6% |
Tillener | 8/10 | 5495 days | 6% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5499 days | 6% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5514 days | 6% |
waters811 | 10/10 | 5560 days | 6% |
alanvn | 9/10 | 5582 days | 6% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5595 days | 6% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5622 days | 6% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5713 days | 6% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5714 days | 6% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5715 days | 6% |
KjellR | 8/10 | 5716 days | 6% |
Ronny | 6/10 | 5718 days | 5% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5729 days | 6% |
MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 5729 days | 6% |
NatasjaV | 9/10 | 5731 days | 6% |
JimmyK | 8/10 | 5731 days | 6% |
Joery | 9/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 5739 days | 6% |
robix | 9/10 | 5740 days | 6% |
Lynn White | 8/10 | 5740 days | 6% |
Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 5744 days | 6% |
amyd | 9/10 | 5744 days | 6% |
Tolsten | 10/10 | 5745 days | 6% |
Kelly | 8/10 | 5746 days | 6% |
Steven | 8/10 | 5747 days | 6% |
CarleyJ | 9/10 | 5747 days | 6% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5750 days | 6% |
Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 5752 days | 6% |
henriettalee | 8/10 | 5755 days | 6% |
IreneF | 9/10 | 5756 days | 6% |
FeliciaY | 9/10 | 5758 days | 6% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 5762 days | 6% |
Carly | 9/10 | 5764 days | 6% |
Conway | 9/10 | 5764 days | 6% |
niall stephenson | 10/10 | 5771 days | 6% |
Camilia | 9/10 | 5776 days | 6% |
De Kievit | 8/10 | 5777 days | 6% |
Klalis | 10/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
John | 9/10 | 5783 days | 6% |
Foost | 8/10 | 5786 days | 6% |
Rosa | 9/10 | 5787 days | 6% |
LeaciaS | 8/10 | 5793 days | 6% |
PhillS | 8/10 | 5794 days | 6% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 5798 days | 6% |
Ofer | 10/10 | 5800 days | 6% |
BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 5803 days | 6% |
JulianeH | 6/10 | 5816 days | 5% |
Priyanka | 10/10 | 5822 days | 6% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5827 days | 6% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5832 days | 6% |
Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 5832 days | 6% |
Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 5836 days | 6% |
Susie Wang | 10/10 | 5842 days | 6% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5848 days | 6% |
Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
angusb | 9/10 | 5869 days | 6% |
Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 5878 days | 6% |
Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 5880 days | 6% |
Jessie | 10/10 | 5887 days | 6% |
Emilie | 10/10 | 5888 days | 6% |
HollyB | 10/10 | 5895 days | 6% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5911 days | 6% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 5911 days | 6% |
Michaela | 9/10 | 5924 days | 6% |
Katerina | 10/10 | 5932 days | 6% |
Gray | 9/10 | 5949 days | 6% |
Christine | 8/10 | 5962 days | 6% |
Christine | 8/10 | 5966 days | 6% |
Toby | 10/10 | 6085 days | 6% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 6093 days | 6% |
Stewart | 9/10 | 6096 days | 6% |
Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6110 days | 6% |
Jody | 7/10 | 6125 days | 5% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6127 days | 6% |
Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6132 days | 6% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 6149 days | 6% |
Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6188 days | 6% |
Lena | 8/10 | 6191 days | 6% |
Edwin | 9/10 | 6194 days | 6% |
caroline | 9/10 | 6198 days | 6% |
Stevenson | 10/10 | 6448 days | 6% |
Anita | 8/10 | 6450 days | 6% |
Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6457 days | 6% |
Berke | 10/10 | 6478 days | 6% |
Madeleine | 10/10 | 6478 days | 6% |
Rogier | 5/10 | 6479 days | 4% |
Wendy | 5/10 | 6483 days | 4% |
Sonja | 8/10 | 6490 days | 6% |
Hennielene | 9/10 | 6491 days | 6% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6491 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
1.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.