Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1743 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2289 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3221 days | 41% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3238 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3255 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3275 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3291 days | 38% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3305 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3543 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3543 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3548 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3558 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3564 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3577 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3579 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3597 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3599 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3613 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3643 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3660 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4001 days | 12% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4268 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4271 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4273 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4273 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4312 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4327 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4634 days | 17% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4640 days | 17% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4640 days | 17% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4641 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4669 days | 17% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4669 days | 17% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4672 days | 17% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4672 days | 17% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4673 days | 16% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4691 days | 17% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4724 days | 17% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4743 days | 17% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4754 days | 17% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4762 days | 17% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 4996 days | 17% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5017 days | 17% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5025 days | 17% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5026 days | 17% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5026 days | 17% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5026 days | 17% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5030 days | 17% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5030 days | 17% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5030 days | 17% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5032 days | 17% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5036 days | 17% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5039 days | 17% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5040 days | 17% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5042 days | 17% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5044 days | 17% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5044 days | 17% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5047 days | 17% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5051 days | 17% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5054 days | 16% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5072 days | 16% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5090 days | 17% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5130 days | 17% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5133 days | 17% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5151 days | 17% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5353 days | 17% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5370 days | 17% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5378 days | 17% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5379 days | 17% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5381 days | 17% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5381 days | 17% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5383 days | 17% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5386 days | 17% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5390 days | 17% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5390 days | 17% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5393 days | 17% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5394 days | 17% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5397 days | 17% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5397 days | 17% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5401 days | 17% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5402 days | 17% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5403 days | 17% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5403 days | 17% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5409 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5409 days | 17% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5410 days | 17% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5411 days | 16% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5411 days | 17% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5412 days | 16% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5414 days | 17% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5417 days | 17% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5419 days | 17% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5421 days | 17% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5421 days | 17% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5423 days | 17% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5486 days | 17% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5516 days | 17% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5547 days | 17% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5638 days | 17% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5694 days | 17% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5707 days | 17% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5730 days | 17% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5742 days | 17% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5743 days | 16% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5747 days | 17% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5748 days | 17% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5761 days | 17% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5762 days | 17% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5767 days | 17% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5771 days | 16% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5782 days | 17% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5789 days | 17% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5795 days | 16% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5798 days | 17% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5820 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5820 days | 17% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5835 days | 17% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5835 days | 17% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5836 days | 17% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5839 days | 17% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5844 days | 17% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5849 days | 17% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5851 days | 17% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5851 days | 17% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5853 days | 17% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5855 days | 17% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5859 days | 17% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5859 days | 17% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5862 days | 17% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5863 days | 17% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5877 days | 17% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5881 days | 17% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5896 days | 17% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5941 days | 17% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5963 days | 17% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5976 days | 17% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6003 days | 17% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6095 days | 17% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6095 days | 17% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6096 days | 17% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6097 days | 17% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6099 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6111 days | 17% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6111 days | 17% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6113 days | 17% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6113 days | 17% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6118 days | 17% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6120 days | 17% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6121 days | 17% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6121 days | 17% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6126 days | 17% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6126 days | 17% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6126 days | 17% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6127 days | 17% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6129 days | 17% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6129 days | 17% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6131 days | 17% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6133 days | 17% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6136 days | 17% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6138 days | 17% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6140 days | 17% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6143 days | 17% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6145 days | 17% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6145 days | 17% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6152 days | 17% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6157 days | 17% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6158 days | 17% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6159 days | 17% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6159 days | 17% |
| John | 9/10 | 6164 days | 17% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6167 days | 17% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6168 days | 17% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6175 days | 17% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6176 days | 17% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6179 days | 17% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6181 days | 17% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6185 days | 17% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6198 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6204 days | 17% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6208 days | 17% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6213 days | 17% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6213 days | 17% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6217 days | 17% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6223 days | 17% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6229 days | 17% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6233 days | 17% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6251 days | 17% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6259 days | 17% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6261 days | 17% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6268 days | 17% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6269 days | 17% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6277 days | 17% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6292 days | 17% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6292 days | 17% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6305 days | 17% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6313 days | 17% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6330 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6343 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6347 days | 17% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6467 days | 17% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6475 days | 17% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6478 days | 17% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6492 days | 17% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6507 days | 16% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6509 days | 17% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6514 days | 17% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6531 days | 17% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6570 days | 17% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6573 days | 17% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6576 days | 17% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6580 days | 17% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6829 days | 17% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6831 days | 17% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6838 days | 17% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6860 days | 17% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6860 days | 17% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6861 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6865 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6872 days | 17% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6873 days | 17% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6873 days | 17% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.