G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.50%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1828 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2375 days | 78% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3306 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3323 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3340 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3360 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3376 days | 38% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3390 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3628 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3628 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3633 days | 28% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3643 days | 26% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3649 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3662 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3664 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3683 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3684 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3698 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3728 days | 24% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3745 days | 24% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4086 days | 11% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4397 days | 19% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4412 days | 19% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4426 days | 19% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4719 days | 19% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4725 days | 19% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4725 days | 19% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4726 days | 12% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4754 days | 19% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4754 days | 19% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4757 days | 19% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4757 days | 19% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4758 days | 18% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4776 days | 19% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4809 days | 19% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4828 days | 19% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4839 days | 19% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4847 days | 19% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5082 days | 19% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5102 days | 19% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5110 days | 19% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5111 days | 19% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5111 days | 19% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5111 days | 19% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5115 days | 19% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5115 days | 19% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5115 days | 19% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5117 days | 19% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5121 days | 19% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5124 days | 19% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5125 days | 19% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5127 days | 19% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5129 days | 19% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5129 days | 19% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5132 days | 19% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5136 days | 19% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5139 days | 18% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5157 days | 18% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5175 days | 19% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5215 days | 19% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5218 days | 19% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5236 days | 19% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5439 days | 19% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5455 days | 19% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5463 days | 19% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5464 days | 19% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5466 days | 19% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5466 days | 19% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5468 days | 19% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5471 days | 19% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5475 days | 19% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5475 days | 19% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5478 days | 19% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5479 days | 19% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5482 days | 19% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5482 days | 19% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5486 days | 19% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5487 days | 19% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5488 days | 19% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5488 days | 19% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5494 days | 17% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5494 days | 19% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5495 days | 19% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5496 days | 18% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5496 days | 19% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5497 days | 18% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5499 days | 19% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5502 days | 19% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5504 days | 19% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5506 days | 19% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5506 days | 19% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5508 days | 19% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5571 days | 19% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5601 days | 19% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5632 days | 19% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5724 days | 19% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5780 days | 19% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5793 days | 19% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5815 days | 19% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5827 days | 19% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5828 days | 18% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5832 days | 19% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5833 days | 19% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5846 days | 19% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5847 days | 19% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5852 days | 19% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5856 days | 18% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5867 days | 19% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5874 days | 19% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5880 days | 18% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5883 days | 19% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5905 days | 15% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5905 days | 19% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5920 days | 19% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5920 days | 19% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5921 days | 19% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5924 days | 19% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5929 days | 19% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5934 days | 19% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5936 days | 19% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5936 days | 19% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5938 days | 19% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5940 days | 19% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5944 days | 19% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5944 days | 19% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5947 days | 19% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5948 days | 19% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5962 days | 19% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5966 days | 19% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5981 days | 19% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6027 days | 19% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6049 days | 19% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6062 days | 19% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6089 days | 19% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6180 days | 19% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6181 days | 19% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6182 days | 19% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6182 days | 19% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6184 days | 17% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6196 days | 19% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6196 days | 19% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6198 days | 19% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6198 days | 19% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6204 days | 19% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6205 days | 19% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6206 days | 19% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6207 days | 19% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6211 days | 19% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6211 days | 19% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6212 days | 19% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6213 days | 19% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6214 days | 19% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6214 days | 19% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6217 days | 19% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6219 days | 19% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6221 days | 19% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6223 days | 19% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6225 days | 19% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6228 days | 19% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6231 days | 19% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6231 days | 19% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6237 days | 19% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6242 days | 19% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6244 days | 19% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6245 days | 19% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6245 days | 19% |
| John | 9/10 | 6249 days | 19% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6252 days | 19% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6253 days | 19% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6260 days | 19% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6261 days | 19% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6265 days | 19% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6266 days | 19% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6270 days | 19% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6283 days | 17% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6289 days | 19% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6293 days | 19% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6298 days | 19% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6299 days | 19% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6302 days | 19% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6308 days | 19% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6315 days | 19% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6319 days | 19% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6336 days | 19% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6345 days | 19% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6347 days | 19% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6354 days | 19% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6355 days | 19% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6362 days | 19% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6377 days | 19% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6378 days | 19% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6391 days | 19% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6399 days | 19% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6416 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6429 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6432 days | 19% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6552 days | 19% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6560 days | 19% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6563 days | 19% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6577 days | 19% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6592 days | 18% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6594 days | 19% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6599 days | 19% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6616 days | 19% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6655 days | 19% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6658 days | 19% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6661 days | 19% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6665 days | 19% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6915 days | 19% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6917 days | 19% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6924 days | 19% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6945 days | 19% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6945 days | 19% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6946 days | 15% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6950 days | 15% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6957 days | 19% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6958 days | 19% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6958 days | 19% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.10% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 55 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.03% |
| 198 | -4.05% |
| 199 | -4.07% |
| 200 | -4.10% |
| 201 | -4.12% |
| 202 | -4.14% |
| 203 | -4.16% |
| … | … |
1.75% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.