Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1750 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2297 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3228 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3245 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3262 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3282 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3298 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3312 days | 39% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3550 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3550 days | 30% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3555 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3565 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3571 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3584 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3586 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3604 days | 28% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3606 days | 28% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3620 days | 27% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3650 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3667 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4008 days | 13% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4275 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4278 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4280 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4280 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4319 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4334 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4641 days | 18% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4647 days | 18% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4647 days | 18% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4648 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4676 days | 18% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4676 days | 17% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4679 days | 17% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4679 days | 17% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4680 days | 17% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4698 days | 17% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4731 days | 18% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4750 days | 18% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4761 days | 18% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4769 days | 18% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5004 days | 17% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5024 days | 18% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5032 days | 18% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5033 days | 18% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5033 days | 18% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5033 days | 17% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5037 days | 18% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5037 days | 18% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5037 days | 18% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5039 days | 18% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5043 days | 17% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5046 days | 17% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5047 days | 18% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5049 days | 17% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5051 days | 17% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5051 days | 17% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5054 days | 18% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5058 days | 18% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5061 days | 17% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5079 days | 17% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5097 days | 18% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5137 days | 17% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5140 days | 18% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5158 days | 18% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5361 days | 17% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5377 days | 18% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5385 days | 18% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5386 days | 18% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5388 days | 17% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5388 days | 18% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5390 days | 17% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5393 days | 18% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5397 days | 18% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5397 days | 18% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5400 days | 17% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5401 days | 18% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5404 days | 17% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5404 days | 18% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5408 days | 18% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5409 days | 18% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5410 days | 18% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5410 days | 18% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5416 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5416 days | 18% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5417 days | 17% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5418 days | 17% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5418 days | 18% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5419 days | 17% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5421 days | 18% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5424 days | 17% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5426 days | 18% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5428 days | 17% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5428 days | 18% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5430 days | 18% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5493 days | 18% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5523 days | 18% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5554 days | 18% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5646 days | 18% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5702 days | 18% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5715 days | 18% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5737 days | 18% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5749 days | 18% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5750 days | 17% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5754 days | 18% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5755 days | 17% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5768 days | 18% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5769 days | 18% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5774 days | 18% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5778 days | 17% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5789 days | 18% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5796 days | 18% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5802 days | 17% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5805 days | 18% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5827 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5827 days | 18% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5842 days | 18% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5842 days | 18% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5843 days | 18% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5846 days | 18% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5851 days | 18% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5856 days | 18% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5858 days | 18% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5858 days | 18% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5860 days | 18% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5862 days | 18% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5866 days | 18% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5866 days | 17% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5869 days | 17% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5870 days | 18% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5884 days | 17% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5888 days | 18% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5903 days | 17% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5949 days | 18% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5971 days | 18% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5984 days | 18% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6011 days | 18% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6102 days | 18% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6103 days | 18% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6103 days | 18% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6104 days | 17% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6106 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6118 days | 17% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6118 days | 18% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6120 days | 18% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6120 days | 17% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6125 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6127 days | 18% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6128 days | 18% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6128 days | 17% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6134 days | 17% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6136 days | 17% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6136 days | 18% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6140 days | 17% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6143 days | 17% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6145 days | 18% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6147 days | 18% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6150 days | 18% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6152 days | 18% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6152 days | 18% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6159 days | 18% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6164 days | 18% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6165 days | 17% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6166 days | 18% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6166 days | 18% |
| John | 9/10 | 6171 days | 18% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6174 days | 17% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6175 days | 18% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6182 days | 17% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6183 days | 17% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6186 days | 17% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6188 days | 18% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6192 days | 18% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6205 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6211 days | 18% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6215 days | 18% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6220 days | 18% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6220 days | 18% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6224 days | 18% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6230 days | 18% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6236 days | 18% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6240 days | 18% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6258 days | 18% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6267 days | 18% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6269 days | 18% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6275 days | 18% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6276 days | 18% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6284 days | 18% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6299 days | 18% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6299 days | 18% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6312 days | 18% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6320 days | 18% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6337 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6350 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6354 days | 17% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6474 days | 18% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6482 days | 18% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6485 days | 18% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6499 days | 17% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6514 days | 17% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6516 days | 17% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6521 days | 17% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6538 days | 18% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6577 days | 18% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6580 days | 17% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6583 days | 18% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6587 days | 18% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6837 days | 18% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6839 days | 17% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6846 days | 18% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6867 days | 18% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6867 days | 18% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6868 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6872 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6879 days | 17% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6880 days | 18% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6880 days | 18% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.