Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Apex Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
208 Valid Reviews
The Apex Rental Cars experience has a total of 232 reviews. There are 208 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 24 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 208 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 48 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 40 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 17 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 8 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 1/10 | 36 |
|
17% |
66.73% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars valid reviews is 66.73% and is based on 208 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
94 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 208 valid reviews, the experience has 94 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 34 |
|
36% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars face-to-face reviews is 82.45% and is based on 94 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
71.76%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB | 10/10 | 37 days | 100% |
| Ondrej | 1/10 | 647 days | 31% |
| Will | 1/10 | 676 days | 30% |
| Derek UK | 10/10 | 676 days | 74% |
| Barry | 3/10 | 738 days | 37% |
| Klm | 3/10 | 768 days | 36% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 799 days | 64% |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 799 days | 64% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 829 days | 61% |
| Melissa | 1/10 | 860 days | 23% |
| Nyah | 1/10 | 1013 days | 17% |
| David M | 3/10 | 1013 days | 23% |
| Karla, Sydney | 10/10 | 1194 days | 28% |
| Neville | 1/10 | 1378 days | 7% |
| A Tango | 10/10 | 1406 days | 15% |
| Nicholas Chin | 1/10 | 1529 days | 4% |
| Trista McLean | 10/10 | 1743 days | 5% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 1802 days | 5% |
| Kane | 1/10 | 1833 days | 2% |
| Melanie Brown | 8/10 | 1924 days | 5% |
| World Traveller | 1/10 | 1954 days | 2% |
| Dave Berry | 10/10 | 1955 days | 5% |
| RJ | 1/10 | 1955 days | 2% |
| R Woolley | 10/10 | 2108 days | 4% |
| Claire Wood | 10/10 | 2137 days | 4% |
| ALEKSANDROV Igor Avramovski | 1/10 | 2168 days | 2% |
| Luiz | 2/10 | 2168 days | 2% |
| Jorge | 1/10 | 2199 days | 2% |
| Adam Beevers | 3/10 | 2199 days | 2% |
| Megan | 1/10 | 2199 days | 2% |
| Marc | 3/10 | 2229 days | 2% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2229 days | 4% |
| Jacques | 1/10 | 2229 days | 2% |
| Janet | 10/10 | 2260 days | 4% |
| Shelby and Matt | 10/10 | 2260 days | 4% |
| Taki Green | 1/10 | 2290 days | 2% |
| Mel | 1/10 | 2290 days | 2% |
| David | 5/10 | 2290 days | 3% |
| JS | 1/10 | 2413 days | 1% |
| Yoke | 1/10 | 2443 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Gallant | 7/10 | 2443 days | 3% |
| Yvonne M Hackenberg | 10/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
| Miss T | 1/10 | 2443 days | 1% |
| Me | 1/10 | 2443 days | 1% |
| Mike Purchas | 2/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
| Gal | 1/10 | 2474 days | 1% |
| M Reeder | 2/10 | 2502 days | 2% |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2533 days | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2533 days | 3% |
| Reena Scobie | 1/10 | 2533 days | 1% |
| Bill Brennan | 9/10 | 2533 days | 3% |
| Jeff & Sharon | 2/10 | 2533 days | 2% |
| Craig | 5/10 | 2533 days | 3% |
| Mel B | 1/10 | 2533 days | 1% |
| David | 1/10 | 2533 days | 1% |
| JR WU | 2/10 | 2564 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Lilly | 10/10 | 2594 days | 3% |
| Arlene | 8/10 | 2655 days | 3% |
| Penny Mackay | 10/10 | 2655 days | 3% |
| Laura | 3/10 | 2717 days | 2% |
| Bharat | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Gandalf | 4/10 | 2808 days | 2% |
| siti fatimah adnan | 10/10 | 2838 days | 3% |
| Katie | 1/10 | 2839 days | 1% |
| Giovanni | 5/10 | 2839 days | 2% |
| Aileen Davies | 2/10 | 2839 days | 1% |
| Nicola | 1/10 | 2839 days | 1% |
| Dane | 1/10 | 2839 days | 1% |
| David williams | 3/10 | 2839 days | 2% |
| Yan Xiao | 3/10 | 2839 days | 2% |
| Peter Dawkins | 10/10 | 2866 days | 3% |
| David | 2/10 | 2867 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 10/10 | 2897 days | 3% |
| You Joon Kim | 1/10 | 2898 days | 1% |
| Chris Monk | 8/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
| Helen Burgess | 2/10 | 2958 days | 1% |
| Carol Smith | 1/10 | 2958 days | 1% |
| Richard Hunter | 1/10 | 2958 days | 1% |
| peter hendry | 1/10 | 2989 days | 1% |
| Katharina Koch | 8/10 | 3216 days | 2% |
| Luna Tarius | 1/10 | 3232 days | 1% |
| Carly Biedul | 10/10 | 3241 days | 2% |
| Guillaume Deleuze | 6/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Brad Dean | 2/10 | 3262 days | 1% |
| dave car | 1/10 | 3262 days | 1% |
| Rhydian Templer | 8/10 | 3273 days | 2% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
| Nina Kaspar | 6/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
| Silvia Hermosillo | 1/10 | 3293 days | 1% |
| Tony Algie | 8/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
| diane wong | 8/10 | 3323 days | 2% |
| Maryanne Wardlaw | 2/10 | 3384 days | 1% |
| Hans Dersch | 1/10 | 3446 days | 1% |
| Kuldeep Nandurkar | 9/10 | 3507 days | 2% |
| Emily Noyd | 10/10 | 3557 days | 1% |
| Christofer Cronholm | 6/10 | 3597 days | 1% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 9/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| Geoff Plunkett | 10/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
| Pawa | 7/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
| James Norcliffe | 10/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
| Andrew Barnden | 10/10 | 3750 days | 1% |
| Sheila Wee | 10/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
| Joana | 8/10 | 3951 days | 1% |
| Lea Karl | 8/10 | 4012 days | 1% |
| Travelgirl | 1/10 | 4024 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
| Natalie Boehm | 8/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Bradford Young | 1/10 | 4390 days | 0% |
| regi kiwi | 10/10 | 4390 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 9/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 10/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Wright | 7/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 9/10 | 5042 days | 1% |
| Jeroen Bartos | 8/10 | 5043 days | 1% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 8/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
| Aled | 9/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Ute Rogawski | 6/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Asha | 7/10 | 5090 days | 1% |
| Rene Rypkema | 8/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
| ZubZubZub | 10/10 | 5212 days | 1% |
| Mascot | 9/10 | 5212 days | 1% |
| joE | 10/10 | 5212 days | 1% |
| Sherbertdip | 8/10 | 5212 days | 1% |
| tj10128 | 10/10 | 5243 days | 1% |
| Nicky Bell | 9/10 | 5341 days | 1% |
| Gerryq Winters | 9/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
| A Jones | 6/10 | 5368 days | 1% |
| Katarina Bokor | 8/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
| Karen Stephens | 7/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
| M Bigras | 8/10 | 5378 days | 1% |
| Binder | 7/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Jo Meekley | 8/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Guy Cohen | 8/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Ven | 8/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Wouter Moui | 7/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Tanya & Florian | 9/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
| Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
| Diana Clipsham | 6/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Lynn Leitch | 9/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Stephen Leitch | 9/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5419 days | 1% |
| hellsknipe356 | 10/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| chumfft | 10/10 | 5639 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5724 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5730 days | 1% |
| Hana Vokata | 8/10 | 5735 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 8/10 | 5758 days | 1% |
| Senel | 10/10 | 5768 days | 1% |
| Cheryl Gorman | 10/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 8/10 | 5783 days | 1% |
| Eva | 6/10 | 5787 days | 1% |
| Alain Deslandres | 7/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| Ross & Catherine Litherland | 8/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| graemeh1 | 7/10 | 5835 days | 1% |
| martinab | 8/10 | 5835 days | 1% |
| taupoguy | 10/10 | 5851 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 8/10 | 5851 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Thomas Rust | 9/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| X Otte | 8/10 | 5859 days | 1% |
| kymberlyw | 9/10 | 6096 days | 1% |
| stephen | 9/10 | 6096 days | 1% |
| StijmH | 8/10 | 6112 days | 1% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6112 days | 1% |
| Rene | 9/10 | 6118 days | 1% |
| BrzezinskaM | 10/10 | 6120 days | 1% |
| AndreB | 9/10 | 6120 days | 1% |
| Dalibor | 9/10 | 6129 days | 1% |
| Pavel | 8/10 | 6131 days | 1% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6165 days | 1% |
| AndreM | 9/10 | 6165 days | 1% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6165 days | 1% |
| Eugen | 9/10 | 6167 days | 1% |
| Maike | 9/10 | 6167 days | 1% |
| Mary | 7/10 | 6168 days | 1% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6185 days | 1% |
| Emilie | 9/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Vanessa | 5/10 | 6284 days | 1% |
| chubby69 | 10/10 | 6338 days | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6343 days | 1% |
| David Fowler | 7/10 | 6362 days | 1% |
| Karen C | 6/10 | 6426 days | 1% |
| Menashe | 7/10 | 6465 days | 1% |
| Bryony Wilson | 8/10 | 6475 days | 1% |
| Beate Sinn | 9/10 | 6479 days | 1% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6479 days | 1% |
| Smith | 6/10 | 6488 days | 1% |
| Carmen Dolny | 8/10 | 6496 days | 1% |
| Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6496 days | 1% |
| Gustavo | 9/10 | 6496 days | 1% |
| Kilsby | 9/10 | 6523 days | 1% |
| Juerg | 9/10 | 6536 days | 1% |
| Tanya | 9/10 | 6538 days | 1% |
| Kehoe | 7/10 | 6541 days | 1% |
| Iain | 8/10 | 6542 days | 1% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 6566 days | 1% |
| Dennis | 10/10 | 6842 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Apex Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.99% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 42 days. The Apex Rental Cars experience has 1 recent ranking. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Apex Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 18 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 15 | -0.31% |
| 16 | -0.33% |
| 17 | -0.35% |
| 18 | -0.37% |
| 19 | -0.39% |
| 20 | -0.41% |
| 21 | -0.43% |
| … | … |
7.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.