Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
225 Valid Reviews
The Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience has a total of 226 reviews. There are 225 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 225 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
32% |
9/10 | 72 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 59 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 16 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK valid reviews is 88.18% and is based on 225 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
209 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 225 valid reviews, the experience has 209 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 209 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 64 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 68 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 58 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 16 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK face-to-face reviews is 88.09% and is based on 209 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.07%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Hannah Campbell | 10/10 | 1501 days | 100% |
Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 2947 days | 25% |
Anna Wooster | 8/10 | 2985 days | 24% |
Theo Macer | 10/10 | 2986 days | 25% |
Alex | 9/10 | 3020 days | 24% |
Patrick | 8/10 | 3025 days | 24% |
Bob | 8/10 | 3028 days | 23% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 3036 days | 23% |
Nolwen | 9/10 | 3045 days | 23% |
Cassandra Geyer | 10/10 | 3269 days | 20% |
Sophia and Karen | 10/10 | 3281 days | 19% |
gonzalo caldiz | 9/10 | 3288 days | 19% |
Johannes Frank | 10/10 | 3296 days | 19% |
Nancy Logan | 8/10 | 3303 days | 19% |
Sophie Kalnymsky | 9/10 | 3320 days | 19% |
Henry Wichler | 9/10 | 3329 days | 18% |
Leo James | 8/10 | 3345 days | 18% |
Philip | 10/10 | 3346 days | 18% |
Ulrich Rix | 9/10 | 3359 days | 18% |
Joshua Hortkorn | 7/10 | 3371 days | 17% |
Daria and Annika | 8/10 | 3371 days | 17% |
Anais Boileau | 8/10 | 3373 days | 17% |
Sammy Cronin | 10/10 | 3390 days | 18% |
Selma Krap | 8/10 | 3392 days | 17% |
Martha Taatz | 10/10 | 3699 days | 12% |
Liz and Alan Weathers | 9/10 | 3702 days | 12% |
Jakub Stastny | 7/10 | 4000 days | 6% |
Chris Handley | 8/10 | 4026 days | 6% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 10/10 | 4030 days | 6% |
Ann Winter | 9/10 | 4048 days | 6% |
Phillip | 9/10 | 4048 days | 6% |
Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4056 days | 6% |
Camille Gagnant | 10/10 | 4079 days | 5% |
Anne Collet | 9/10 | 4082 days | 5% |
Mark Wiggington | 9/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
Nina Coopmans | 8/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
Rey Germain | 8/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
Yu-Ti Chu | 10/10 | 4386 days | 9% |
Ton Martens | 10/10 | 4386 days | 9% |
Sebastian | 10/10 | 4399 days | 9% |
Constanze | 9/10 | 4399 days | 9% |
Andre and Marina | 8/10 | 4428 days | 9% |
Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 4471 days | 9% |
Sharon Yates | 10/10 | 4473 days | 9% |
Stefan and Brigit and Janek | 9/10 | 4477 days | 9% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4494 days | 9% |
Pietersen | 8/10 | 4496 days | 9% |
Martina Posch | 10/10 | 4499 days | 9% |
Anna Gottsch | 10/10 | 4500 days | 9% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4727 days | 9% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4735 days | 9% |
Jessica Tilly | 10/10 | 4735 days | 9% |
Moss | 9/10 | 4745 days | 9% |
Jill Homewood | 9/10 | 4753 days | 9% |
Olivia Reiter | 10/10 | 4753 days | 9% |
Ruth Har | 9/10 | 4754 days | 9% |
Mike Wright | 10/10 | 4754 days | 9% |
Ed Trucie | 10/10 | 4755 days | 9% |
M Robinson | 8/10 | 4756 days | 9% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4756 days | 9% |
Melanie Friessen | 8/10 | 4762 days | 9% |
Jochem Snyders | 9/10 | 4763 days | 9% |
James Buryson | 7/10 | 4771 days | 8% |
Johanna & Catrin | 8/10 | 4772 days | 9% |
Susanne MacGyver | 7/10 | 4772 days | 8% |
Sandra Andersen | 9/10 | 4772 days | 9% |
Deana Peters | 8/10 | 4772 days | 9% |
Tom Pratt | 7/10 | 4772 days | 8% |
Rob Gill | 10/10 | 4773 days | 9% |
Elise Violet | 8/10 | 4773 days | 9% |
Walter & Heidi Baumann | 8/10 | 4774 days | 9% |
Hendrik F | 9/10 | 4774 days | 9% |
Emily Wikston | 9/10 | 4775 days | 9% |
Nikki Bentley | 9/10 | 4775 days | 9% |
Siegfried Krueger | 10/10 | 4776 days | 9% |
Janet | 10/10 | 4789 days | 9% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4820 days | 9% |
Julia Edman | 8/10 | 4834 days | 9% |
Sarah Graham | 10/10 | 4867 days | 9% |
Laura McCusker | 9/10 | 4867 days | 9% |
Melanie Wood | 8/10 | 4867 days | 9% |
J Bliss | 8/10 | 4881 days | 9% |
Jack Potman | 8/10 | 5083 days | 9% |
Lennart Lundberg | 10/10 | 5097 days | 9% |
Katy Johnson | 8/10 | 5101 days | 9% |
Iain Campbell | 8/10 | 5104 days | 9% |
Susannah Eduart | 10/10 | 5106 days | 9% |
Patrick Gloede | 9/10 | 5109 days | 9% |
Daniel Kriecht | 10/10 | 5109 days | 9% |
Marian | 9/10 | 5112 days | 9% |
Marquardt and Bernd | 10/10 | 5112 days | 9% |
Thorsten Grocholl | 9/10 | 5113 days | 9% |
Cory Wornell | 9/10 | 5115 days | 9% |
W Groshops | 9/10 | 5115 days | 9% |
Aimee Pollett | 8/10 | 5116 days | 9% |
John Mayer | 8/10 | 5116 days | 9% |
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy | 10/10 | 5116 days | 9% |
Marty Fey | 10/10 | 5117 days | 9% |
Tricia Goggin | 9/10 | 5118 days | 9% |
Jim & Suzy Ducker | 9/10 | 5119 days | 9% |
Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5124 days | 9% |
Sue Hickman | 10/10 | 5124 days | 9% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5126 days | 9% |
Andreas Fritesche | 8/10 | 5129 days | 9% |
Annelie & Martin | 10/10 | 5130 days | 9% |
Ursula Scherch | 9/10 | 5130 days | 9% |
Alexander & Stephanie | 8/10 | 5131 days | 9% |
J Holden | 9/10 | 5132 days | 9% |
Mr and Mrs Lambert | 10/10 | 5133 days | 9% |
Jean-Francois Guilbault | 9/10 | 5139 days | 9% |
Amanda Wallace | 9/10 | 5144 days | 9% |
Diana Clipsham | 8/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
J Thorn | 10/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
Daniel Bogdanowitsch | 10/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
E M Klap | 8/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
Sandra Schneifer | 9/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
John Balson | 10/10 | 5146 days | 9% |
Mark Robinson | 10/10 | 5146 days | 9% |
Gillian de Vries | 9/10 | 5147 days | 9% |
Hemi Stein | 10/10 | 5148 days | 9% |
C Gobl | 8/10 | 5153 days | 9% |
Moniek Steyaert | 8/10 | 5154 days | 9% |
Remke | 2/10 | 5155 days | 4% |
aggiemary04 | 10/10 | 5277 days | 9% |
Bjorn Sall | 8/10 | 5472 days | 9% |
Benedict Fluthman | 6/10 | 5481 days | 8% |
Peter Schmidt | 5/10 | 5491 days | 7% |
Leonard Vans | 7/10 | 5491 days | 8% |
Matthias A | 9/10 | 5493 days | 9% |
Barbara & Sven | 9/10 | 5493 days | 9% |
Jonathan Martin | 9/10 | 5494 days | 9% |
Jan Kuenzel | 10/10 | 5497 days | 9% |
Evelien Thijs | 8/10 | 5498 days | 9% |
Mark | 8/10 | 5499 days | 9% |
Hans & Huxi | 8/10 | 5499 days | 9% |
John Mathers | 10/10 | 5500 days | 9% |
S Bourford | 9/10 | 5500 days | 9% |
Heike Pless | 10/10 | 5500 days | 9% |
Henrik Plichta | 9/10 | 5500 days | 9% |
Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5500 days | 9% |
Roger Trusedale | 9/10 | 5501 days | 9% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5504 days | 9% |
Tim Stick | 8/10 | 5505 days | 9% |
David Hobson | 9/10 | 5511 days | 9% |
Nikki Wood | 9/10 | 5513 days | 9% |
van der Wakker | 8/10 | 5514 days | 9% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5519 days | 9% |
Alain Deslandres | 8/10 | 5532 days | 9% |
Honeymooners | 4/10 | 5550 days | 6% |
balthes | 7/10 | 5564 days | 8% |
eliertv | 7/10 | 5565 days | 8% |
gabei | 9/10 | 5565 days | 9% |
marcol | 10/10 | 5566 days | 9% |
florian | 9/10 | 5566 days | 9% |
mariak | 7/10 | 5567 days | 8% |
Steffi Marco | 10/10 | 5585 days | 9% |
Stephanie Steiner | 8/10 | 5585 days | 9% |
Bert Wierzy | 7/10 | 5588 days | 8% |
Sarah Goeckener | 7/10 | 5591 days | 8% |
Zach | 9/10 | 5591 days | 9% |
katharina | 7/10 | 5591 days | 8% |
Bushbeck | 10/10 | 5591 days | 9% |
bdevries | 9/10 | 5592 days | 9% |
Stefanie Micheler | 10/10 | 5592 days | 9% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 5592 days | 9% |
Gina Swindells | 10/10 | 5592 days | 9% |
Elodie | 8/10 | 5592 days | 9% |
MV Vroenhoven | 8/10 | 5596 days | 9% |
Karen Fisher | 10/10 | 5607 days | 9% |
Dimitry Zonnet | 9/10 | 5607 days | 9% |
jmulrooney | 10/10 | 5611 days | 9% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5626 days | 9% |
G Miller | 10/10 | 5672 days | 9% |
muriellef | 9/10 | 5707 days | 9% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 5745 days | 9% |
KimC | 8/10 | 5813 days | 9% |
BVanW | 9/10 | 5817 days | 9% |
VirginiaR | 10/10 | 5817 days | 9% |
AndrewL1 | 8/10 | 5817 days | 9% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5820 days | 9% |
Lisa Duin | 7/10 | 5823 days | 8% |
Lucia Vontobel | 9/10 | 5823 days | 9% |
LaurensD | 8/10 | 5825 days | 9% |
Jan | 9/10 | 5843 days | 9% |
JohannaB | 9/10 | 5844 days | 9% |
Viola | 9/10 | 5844 days | 9% |
Elinor Wajngot | 10/10 | 5847 days | 9% |
Hannes Ockerman | 7/10 | 5848 days | 8% |
FrasorK | 9/10 | 5858 days | 9% |
HelenAustralia | 9/10 | 5858 days | 9% |
JuliaG1 | 9/10 | 5858 days | 9% |
Douglas | 8/10 | 5867 days | 9% |
Eugene | 9/10 | 5867 days | 9% |
InkenGermany | 10/10 | 5867 days | 9% |
ralphl | 7/10 | 5869 days | 8% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5892 days | 9% |
Denis | 10/10 | 5895 days | 9% |
Andie | 8/10 | 5897 days | 9% |
Erik | 9/10 | 5898 days | 9% |
George | 10/10 | 5902 days | 9% |
Miranda | 8/10 | 5902 days | 9% |
Sandy | 9/10 | 5902 days | 9% |
Emory | 9/10 | 5910 days | 9% |
Patrick | 10/10 | 5947 days | 9% |
Lucy | 9/10 | 5956 days | 9% |
Masako | 10/10 | 5960 days | 9% |
NeeleO | 8/10 | 5976 days | 9% |
mark_mientjes | 10/10 | 5988 days | 9% |
Tom van Ommen | 10/10 | 5988 days | 9% |
Nathan | 10/10 | 5998 days | 9% |
Sune | 9/10 | 6015 days | 9% |
Allison Hosley | 10/10 | 6024 days | 9% |
Brent Scanlan | 10/10 | 6167 days | 9% |
Marian Mckinney | 5/10 | 6218 days | 7% |
Steven | 8/10 | 6222 days | 9% |
Brendan Marshall | 9/10 | 6230 days | 9% |
Damien Marshall | 8/10 | 6230 days | 9% |
Roman | 7/10 | 6236 days | 8% |
ranker_851 | 9/10 | 6236 days | 9% |
Vaclaf | 8/10 | 6236 days | 9% |
Alex | 10/10 | 6253 days | 9% |
Anneli | 8/10 | 6273 days | 9% |
Shelley | 10/10 | 6532 days | 9% |
John | 10/10 | 6555 days | 9% |
Jonas | 8/10 | 6560 days | 9% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.01% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.95% |
198 | -3.97% |
199 | -3.99% |
200 | -4.01% |
201 | -4.03% |
202 | -4.05% |
203 | -4.07% |
… | … |
1.81% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.