G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
246 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has a total of 246 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 246 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 67 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 64 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 70 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 34 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
85.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi valid reviews is 85.33% and is based on 246 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
236 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 246 valid reviews, the experience has 236 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 236 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 62 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 62 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 68 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 34 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi face-to-face reviews is 85.34% and is based on 236 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
86.88%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lynette Valk | 10/10 | 1361 days | 100% |
Emma | 9/10 | 1755 days | 30% |
JBUSA | 1/10 | 2212 days | 10% |
Isabel Zedelius | 10/10 | 2861 days | 17% |
Barbara Hirsch | 6/10 | 2868 days | 15% |
Colin George | 10/10 | 2910 days | 17% |
Babs Muelink | 8/10 | 2913 days | 16% |
Harry Smit | 8/10 | 2913 days | 16% |
Danny | 9/10 | 2923 days | 16% |
Miriam Gamble | 10/10 | 2958 days | 16% |
Josh Symons | 8/10 | 3194 days | 13% |
Lewis Whittle | 8/10 | 3197 days | 13% |
Max von Felde | 8/10 | 3199 days | 13% |
Gabriel Siibers | 9/10 | 3216 days | 13% |
Stephan | 8/10 | 3258 days | 12% |
Lola | 10/10 | 3886 days | 5% |
Steffen | 9/10 | 3916 days | 5% |
Helma Druyken | 7/10 | 3916 days | 5% |
Austin Johns | 10/10 | 3920 days | 5% |
Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 3921 days | 5% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 3942 days | 5% |
Mike Majnik | 10/10 | 3942 days | 5% |
Andreas Jung | 8/10 | 3942 days | 5% |
Emilie Chanbon | 8/10 | 3949 days | 5% |
Alexis Redor | 8/10 | 3949 days | 5% |
Petra Kurcova | 8/10 | 3966 days | 4% |
Adam Balcar | 8/10 | 3966 days | 4% |
Elin Paulssen | 10/10 | 3977 days | 4% |
Monique Browne | 10/10 | 3979 days | 4% |
Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 4274 days | 1% |
Camille Coombes | 6/10 | 4276 days | 1% |
Mathieu Maran | 6/10 | 4276 days | 1% |
Glenn Surzur | 7/10 | 4285 days | 1% |
Caderet | 8/10 | 4285 days | 1% |
Francois Marchar | 7/10 | 4293 days | 1% |
Mo Downes | 8/10 | 4297 days | 1% |
Lagunegrand | 8/10 | 4299 days | 1% |
Pink | 6/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
Nadine and Jan | 7/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
Jason | 7/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
Kohler | 9/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
Annie | 9/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
Frans Derks | 9/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
Simon Rawlinson | 9/10 | 4629 days | 6% |
Sam | 10/10 | 4652 days | 6% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4657 days | 6% |
Inge & Erik | 9/10 | 4658 days | 6% |
Cole | 9/10 | 4659 days | 6% |
Frans Roebroek | 9/10 | 4659 days | 6% |
M H Hansen | 10/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
Nick & Adele Waller | 10/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
Stefes Wencke | 9/10 | 4661 days | 6% |
Peter Holt | 9/10 | 4665 days | 6% |
Nout de Wit | 7/10 | 4669 days | 5% |
Guillaume Milcent | 7/10 | 4674 days | 5% |
J Knol | 8/10 | 4703 days | 6% |
Bradley | 9/10 | 4722 days | 6% |
Sanne Ta Stroete | 8/10 | 4728 days | 6% |
Steve & Maggie | 7/10 | 4740 days | 5% |
Chris & Susanna | 4/10 | 4740 days | 4% |
Moniek Roelots | 8/10 | 4746 days | 6% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 9/10 | 4748 days | 6% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 4748 days | 6% |
Jane Stalker | 8/10 | 4754 days | 6% |
Andreas & Sonja | 7/10 | 4755 days | 5% |
Remco te Lintum | 8/10 | 4755 days | 6% |
Janet Arber | 9/10 | 4964 days | 6% |
Michael Welscheubach | 10/10 | 4965 days | 6% |
Lisa Milton | 10/10 | 4976 days | 6% |
Karsten Tannhauser | 10/10 | 4997 days | 6% |
Lynn | 10/10 | 5002 days | 6% |
Jackie MacRostie | 10/10 | 5004 days | 6% |
Nathalie Verzeletti | 8/10 | 5004 days | 6% |
Jen Fyfe | 7/10 | 5005 days | 5% |
David and Karen | 10/10 | 5006 days | 6% |
Michaela Strohmarer | 10/10 | 5006 days | 6% |
Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5010 days | 6% |
Rachel Kent-Lawton | 9/10 | 5014 days | 6% |
Bart & Kim | 10/10 | 5015 days | 6% |
M Holierhoek | 7/10 | 5016 days | 5% |
Mark Irwin | 7/10 | 5025 days | 5% |
Andrew Koster | 8/10 | 5027 days | 6% |
Bernard Gastaud | 9/10 | 5027 days | 6% |
G Elliason | 9/10 | 5028 days | 6% |
Ruben and Jetske | 7/10 | 5032 days | 5% |
Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5034 days | 6% |
Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5034 days | 6% |
Michael Eck | 9/10 | 5035 days | 6% |
Markus Richert | 8/10 | 5036 days | 6% |
Jean-Paul Le Clair | 6/10 | 5036 days | 5% |
Pam de Vos | 8/10 | 5038 days | 6% |
Katherine Bernsdorf | 9/10 | 5038 days | 6% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 5306 days | 6% |
Martina Pankova | 9/10 | 5354 days | 6% |
Kevin F | 9/10 | 5361 days | 6% |
Dwight Odland | 9/10 | 5365 days | 6% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5365 days | 6% |
Siobhan Lorgena | 8/10 | 5376 days | 6% |
NZ_Nana | 10/10 | 5379 days | 6% |
hughesW | 8/10 | 5379 days | 6% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5380 days | 6% |
Tony Killingray | 8/10 | 5382 days | 6% |
Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5385 days | 6% |
Senel | 8/10 | 5386 days | 6% |
Haitsma | 7/10 | 5387 days | 5% |
Mark | 9/10 | 5387 days | 6% |
Hans de Rijk | 9/10 | 5389 days | 6% |
Lynn Tichauer | 10/10 | 5390 days | 6% |
Bunnik | 9/10 | 5392 days | 6% |
Eva | 8/10 | 5396 days | 6% |
Brenda Brelinski | 10/10 | 5401 days | 6% |
Fam Schuijers | 8/10 | 5402 days | 6% |
Irene Turley | 9/10 | 5402 days | 6% |
Alex Baxter | 4/10 | 5403 days | 4% |
Groen | 7/10 | 5404 days | 5% |
Mark Marg | 8/10 | 5406 days | 6% |
Yvonne Ing | 9/10 | 5406 days | 6% |
Otto | 7/10 | 5406 days | 5% |
Annette Friskopp | 8/10 | 5407 days | 6% |
Vu Thi Lan | 6/10 | 5424 days | 5% |
marylus | 8/10 | 5453 days | 6% |
elskeb | 7/10 | 5457 days | 5% |
djrogers | 8/10 | 5462 days | 6% |
Jane | 10/10 | 5469 days | 6% |
Seiler | 10/10 | 5471 days | 6% |
mdarras | 7/10 | 5473 days | 5% |
Hanne Wichmann | 10/10 | 5473 days | 6% |
Jansen | 8/10 | 5473 days | 6% |
Hans & Karin | 8/10 | 5473 days | 6% |
Bert Wierzy | 8/10 | 5476 days | 6% |
Gaelle | 8/10 | 5479 days | 6% |
Ricarda | 8/10 | 5479 days | 6% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5479 days | 6% |
Malinka Nuefeld | 9/10 | 5479 days | 6% |
Philip Ryott | 9/10 | 5479 days | 6% |
Vicki Cashmore | 9/10 | 5481 days | 6% |
Flavia Mionelli | 10/10 | 5481 days | 6% |
J Keimel | 8/10 | 5481 days | 6% |
Ana Garcia | 9/10 | 5482 days | 6% |
TomM | 9/10 | 5705 days | 6% |
MorganK | 9/10 | 5705 days | 6% |
YohanM | 8/10 | 5708 days | 6% |
Dirk | 7/10 | 5713 days | 5% |
IanM | 7/10 | 5714 days | 5% |
CornelissenS | 8/10 | 5730 days | 6% |
Fred | 8/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
Wouter Muller | 7/10 | 5737 days | 5% |
Ian | 10/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
Nick | 9/10 | 5742 days | 6% |
Halley | 9/10 | 5744 days | 6% |
Brian | 10/10 | 5744 days | 6% |
StephC | 7/10 | 5746 days | 5% |
RokP | 10/10 | 5746 days | 6% |
NikolaGermany | 8/10 | 5746 days | 6% |
FrankFlemming | 10/10 | 5747 days | 6% |
JoanneM | 8/10 | 5748 days | 6% |
NikkiB1 | 10/10 | 5748 days | 6% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 5750 days | 6% |
Rafael | 7/10 | 5750 days | 5% |
Laura | 10/10 | 5753 days | 6% |
HelenP | 10/10 | 5756 days | 6% |
Trevor | 10/10 | 5757 days | 6% |
John | 9/10 | 5757 days | 6% |
RoseyUK | 8/10 | 5760 days | 6% |
Yunker | 8/10 | 5762 days | 6% |
Christina | 10/10 | 5762 days | 6% |
Kirsty | 7/10 | 5764 days | 5% |
David | 8/10 | 5764 days | 6% |
KuntzGermany | 10/10 | 5768 days | 6% |
Helen | 7/10 | 5778 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
Martha | 9/10 | 5781 days | 6% |
Rory | 7/10 | 5782 days | 5% |
LeaM | 10/10 | 5783 days | 6% |
Penwell | 9/10 | 5785 days | 6% |
Thierry | 8/10 | 5786 days | 6% |
Mary | 7/10 | 5787 days | 5% |
Ruben | 7/10 | 5787 days | 5% |
FeliciaO | 10/10 | 5792 days | 6% |
Martin | 7/10 | 5798 days | 5% |
Watermann | 8/10 | 5831 days | 6% |
Julia | 10/10 | 5844 days | 6% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5848 days | 6% |
RhysandSteffi | 8/10 | 5864 days | 6% |
Kristina | 8/10 | 5888 days | 6% |
garrick | 9/10 | 5903 days | 6% |
Kees | 8/10 | 5938 days | 6% |
Cory Fusco | 9/10 | 5938 days | 6% |
Katie Wise | 10/10 | 5946 days | 6% |
Steffi | 10/10 | 5949 days | 6% |
Kerstin | 8/10 | 5953 days | 6% |
Nikki Gray | 5/10 | 5963 days | 4% |
Salome | 8/10 | 6021 days | 6% |
Liz Brown | 10/10 | 6050 days | 6% |
Erin White | 8/10 | 6076 days | 6% |
Toby | 8/10 | 6085 days | 6% |
Amy Lumsden | 8/10 | 6089 days | 6% |
Rob and Leo | 9/10 | 6090 days | 6% |
Caroline Cole | 9/10 | 6090 days | 6% |
Ellie Koss | 7/10 | 6090 days | 5% |
Omer Harron | 8/10 | 6093 days | 6% |
Maria Fahlander | 8/10 | 6103 days | 6% |
Graham | 7/10 | 6105 days | 5% |
Phil Connelly | 9/10 | 6105 days | 6% |
Anja | 9/10 | 6106 days | 6% |
Trinkler | 9/10 | 6106 days | 6% |
Ohad | 10/10 | 6106 days | 6% |
Kristine | 10/10 | 6110 days | 6% |
Mariska | 8/10 | 6111 days | 6% |
Ralph Schnizer | 10/10 | 6112 days | 6% |
Mike | 10/10 | 6118 days | 6% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6125 days | 6% |
Juerg | 10/10 | 6154 days | 6% |
Evelyn | 9/10 | 6155 days | 6% |
Tanya | 8/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
Andy | 10/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
Roger Mills | 8/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
Tony and Ken | 10/10 | 6160 days | 6% |
Christian Arnot | 10/10 | 6182 days | 6% |
Anita | 10/10 | 6182 days | 6% |
Francesco | 9/10 | 6187 days | 6% |
Alexis | 8/10 | 6187 days | 6% |
Sarah Wilton | 7/10 | 6188 days | 5% |
ranker_46 | 8/10 | 6315 days | 6% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6424 days | 6% |
Will | 7/10 | 6429 days | 5% |
Michael | 9/10 | 6436 days | 6% |
sven | 5/10 | 6438 days | 4% |
Adi | 9/10 | 6439 days | 6% |
John | 9/10 | 6446 days | 6% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6449 days | 6% |
Silke | 10/10 | 6450 days | 6% |
Heather | 9/10 | 6450 days | 6% |
Ian | 8/10 | 6467 days | 6% |
Karla | 8/10 | 6472 days | 6% |
Meyer | 9/10 | 6476 days | 6% |
Shirely | 9/10 | 6478 days | 6% |
Andreas | 8/10 | 6479 days | 6% |
Herman&Ineke | 10/10 | 6482 days | 6% |
Jensen | 10/10 | 6483 days | 6% |
Stefan | 7/10 | 6487 days | 5% |
Henrich | 8/10 | 6488 days | 6% |
Frank | 9/10 | 6489 days | 6% |
Deirdre | 9/10 | 6491 days | 6% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6491 days | 6% |
ranker_410 | 9/10 | 6502 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
2.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.