Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Western Springs Spot.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Western Springs Spot

Valid Reviews

59 Valid Reviews

The Western Springs Spot experience has a total of 59 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 56
95%
9/10 3
5%
8/10 0
0%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

99.49% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Western Springs Spot valid reviews is 99.49% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

99.49%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Michael Szott 9/10 11 days 96%
Mady Roosen 10/10 39 days 100%
Kerstin Wilmans 10/10 39 days 100%
OB 10/10 39 days 100%
Julie 10/10 39 days 100%
Di Sloan 10/10 39 days 100%
Jamie.wills@yahoo.co.uk 10/10 39 days 100%
David Weyel 10/10 39 days 100%
Holly 10/10 70 days 99%
Günter Handler 10/10 70 days 99%
Francois Petit 10/10 70 days 99%
Ruth Bosustow 10/10 70 days 99%
Emily 10/10 70 days 99%
Elisabeth Schraml 10/10 70 days 99%
Marta 10/10 101 days 98%
Jonathan Nelson 10/10 101 days 98%
Henry 10/10 101 days 98%
Verena Schöser 10/10 101 days 98%
Boy 10/10 131 days 96%
Karl-Friedrich Haenel 10/10 131 days 96%
Alice 10/10 131 days 96%
Hanna 10/10 131 days 96%
Matthias 10/10 131 days 96%
Stacey O 10/10 192 days 91%
Eva Holliwell 10/10 223 days 87%
Wouter 9/10 223 days 83%
Twinnz 10/10 284 days 79%
Rejane Noel 10/10 284 days 79%
Kornel Tornyos 10/10 315 days 74%
Florencia 10/10 315 days 74%
Tom Williams 10/10 315 days 74%
Barnabas Csoka 10/10 315 days 74%
Jelco 10/10 345 days 69%
Ondrej Visa 10/10 345 days 69%
TJ 10/10 345 days 69%
Caron 10/10 376 days 63%
Tristan Temme 10/10 376 days 63%
Niels 10/10 376 days 63%
Conny 10/10 376 days 63%
Alexander Kaulartz 10/10 376 days 63%
Andreas Meyer 10/10 376 days 63%
Franz Kestler 10/10 376 days 63%
Simone 10/10 405 days 58%
Lonneke van Westenbrugge 10/10 405 days 58%
Sarah Mongbo 10/10 405 days 58%
Matt 10/10 497 days 36%
Joe 10/10 528 days 28%
Lot 9/10 528 days 24%
Landon Brown 10/10 528 days 28%
Nolwenn 10/10 528 days 28%
Sean 10/10 528 days 28%
Sharon Hao 10/10 528 days 28%
Eva-Marie 10/10 528 days 28%
Léa Le Coquil 10/10 558 days 19%
Angela Laloli 10/10 558 days 19%
Bevan Haswell 10/10 558 days 19%
Lisa 10/10 558 days 19%
Mark 10/10 589 days 10%
Euge y Luz 10/10 620 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Western Springs Spot experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.18% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Western Springs Spot experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Western Springs Spot experience has been adjusted for 9 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
6 -0.12%
7 -0.14%
8 -0.16%
9 -0.18%
10 -0.20%
11 -0.22%
12 -0.24%

Balancing Adjustment

0.05% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

99%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.