Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Driftaway Queenstown.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Driftaway Queenstown
Valid Reviews
97 Valid Reviews
The Driftaway Queenstown experience has a total of 99 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 83 |
|
86% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.84% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Driftaway Queenstown valid reviews is 97.84% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
97.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jake | 10/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| S Waller | 10/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| Ali Shahahmadi | 10/10 | 70 days | 100% |
| Amelia | 10/10 | 70 days | 100% |
| Cath | 10/10 | 131 days | 99% |
| Ralph and Fiona Bova | 10/10 | 131 days | 99% |
| Chloe | 10/10 | 131 days | 99% |
| Julia ma | 10/10 | 162 days | 98% |
| Keith Fitzgerald | 10/10 | 162 days | 98% |
| Noor Hayah Muslim | 10/10 | 192 days | 97% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 192 days | 95% |
| Jami | 10/10 | 223 days | 95% |
| Scott | 10/10 | 223 days | 95% |
| Tony and ganti | 10/10 | 223 days | 95% |
| Jacky | 10/10 | 254 days | 94% |
| JD | 10/10 | 284 days | 93% |
| N Raj | 10/10 | 315 days | 91% |
| Stephen Dooley | 10/10 | 376 days | 87% |
| Paul S | 10/10 | 376 days | 87% |
| Juergen Poppe | 10/10 | 376 days | 87% |
| Madison & Jackson | 10/10 | 376 days | 87% |
| Sarah B | 10/10 | 405 days | 85% |
| Lu | 8/10 | 405 days | 82% |
| Burt | 9/10 | 436 days | 81% |
| phillip ireland | 10/10 | 436 days | 82% |
| Joel Fryett | 10/10 | 436 days | 82% |
| Paddy | 10/10 | 436 days | 82% |
| Hannah Chipperfield | 10/10 | 467 days | 80% |
| I Herdman | 10/10 | 467 days | 80% |
| Jane | 10/10 | 497 days | 77% |
| L. K. | 9/10 | 497 days | 75% |
| Amor | 10/10 | 528 days | 74% |
| VICKI LEIGH PATON | 10/10 | 528 days | 74% |
| Cholly | 10/10 | 528 days | 74% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 528 days | 72% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 558 days | 71% |
| Chloe | 10/10 | 558 days | 71% |
| Julia Saravia | 10/10 | 589 days | 67% |
| Dylan | 10/10 | 620 days | 64% |
| howard104 | 10/10 | 650 days | 60% |
| David Naylor | 10/10 | 650 days | 60% |
| Jasmine Tan | 10/10 | 681 days | 56% |
| Steve Churchill | 10/10 | 681 days | 56% |
| Christy | 9/10 | 681 days | 55% |
| 小B | 7/10 | 711 days | 44% |
| Chris Ungar | 10/10 | 711 days | 52% |
| Fav | 7/10 | 711 days | 44% |
| Carolyn Folbigg | 10/10 | 711 days | 52% |
| Aliou Lo | 10/10 | 742 days | 48% |
| Bernie | 10/10 | 742 days | 48% |
| Tracy | 10/10 | 742 days | 48% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 742 days | 46% |
| Matt Olejniczak | 10/10 | 742 days | 48% |
| Warwick Jones | 10/10 | 742 days | 48% |
| Family of four | 10/10 | 742 days | 48% |
| John Atkinson | 10/10 | 770 days | 44% |
| Son | 10/10 | 770 days | 44% |
| Murray Harvey | 10/10 | 770 days | 44% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 770 days | 44% |
| Rose Wong | 10/10 | 770 days | 44% |
| Jenny Kinch | 10/10 | 801 days | 39% |
| Edwige | 10/10 | 801 days | 39% |
| Celine | 10/10 | 801 days | 39% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 801 days | 39% |
| Andrew McLoughlin | 10/10 | 801 days | 39% |
| Lucie | 10/10 | 801 days | 39% |
| David | 9/10 | 801 days | 38% |
| Pierre Marty | 9/10 | 832 days | 34% |
| Flore van Dessel | 10/10 | 832 days | 35% |
| Hsiao-Hsien Li | 10/10 | 832 days | 35% |
| Jac Ema | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Sara Jones | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Ryan | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Fareez Haris | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Corrine | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Patricia Pardo | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Markus | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| JM | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Mil | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| McChelle | 10/10 | 862 days | 30% |
| Marelize Ferreira | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 893 days | 24% |
| Rachel Wilcox | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| HP | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| Gary notley-smith | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| Lara | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| Eilis | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| Noa | 10/10 | 893 days | 25% |
| Susan | 10/10 | 923 days | 20% |
| Kevin Daniel Farrell | 10/10 | 923 days | 20% |
| Te Arohanui | 9/10 | 954 days | 14% |
| Karen | 10/10 | 954 days | 14% |
| Anara | 10/10 | 954 days | 14% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 985 days | 9% |
| L Hartley | 8/10 | 985 days | 8% |
| Sue Lander | 10/10 | 1015 days | 5% |
| Gloria | 10/10 | 1046 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Driftaway Queenstown experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.24% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Driftaway Queenstown experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Driftaway Queenstown experience has been adjusted for 12 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 9 | -0.18% |
| 10 | -0.20% |
| 11 | -0.22% |
| 12 | -0.24% |
| 13 | -0.26% |
| 14 | -0.28% |
| 15 | -0.30% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.19% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
98%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.