Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth experience has a total of 53 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
31%
9/10 16
31%
8/10 7
13%
7/10 3
6%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 3
6%

80.96% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth valid reviews is 80.96% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.92%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cn 6/10 138 days 88%
Lotto 10/10 230 days 100%
Kenai 8/10 291 days 96%
Eline 9/10 291 days 97%
Morgane 6/10 350 days 82%
Mladen Savov 10/10 350 days 96%
Ike 5/10 381 days 72%
Simon 9/10 442 days 91%
Milly Struthers 5/10 472 days 68%
Beth 10/10 472 days 90%
Tīwai 9/10 534 days 85%
LuxuryVanDweller 10/10 534 days 86%
Martin 9/10 564 days 83%
can24camp 7/10 656 days 72%
Daph' 10/10 685 days 75%
Andrew 10/10 685 days 75%
Phil K 5/10 685 days 57%
Shelly the Van 10/10 716 days 73%
laura 10/10 716 days 73%
Maren 9/10 747 days 69%
Diana Antunez 9/10 808 days 63%
Marie Perret 9/10 808 days 63%
Apirera 10/10 869 days 58%
Valentin 10/10 869 days 58%
Marine 7/10 869 days 54%
Laura 8/10 930 days 50%
@saltyskin 10/10 930 days 52%
Genevieve 8/10 961 days 47%
Finn 9/10 961 days 48%
Ruohan Li 10/10 991 days 45%
sarah penney 10/10 991 days 45%
Louisa Runge 9/10 1050 days 39%
Linc 10/10 1203 days 27%
Drew 8/10 1295 days 20%
George 4/10 1387 days 9%
Ko 6/10 1387 days 13%
Wayne 8/10 1387 days 15%
Melanie 7/10 1630 days 5%
Bex 9/10 1842 days 4%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 1995 days 3%
Wanderingphoenix 9/10 1995 days 3%
Mathieu 1/10 2117 days 0%
Gracjan 1/10 2146 days 0%
Dave Kitson 10/10 2177 days 3%
Eva Muselaers 9/10 2177 days 3%
Luna 8/10 2177 days 3%
Tassie Travellers 9/10 2238 days 3%
Dona Shiell 8/10 2422 days 2%
Julie 1/10 2452 days 0%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2482 days 2%
Elad 10/10 2483 days 2%
Keybags 9/10 2511 days 2%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.65% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.