Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Epic Campers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
89 Valid Reviews
The Epic Campers experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 89 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 89 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Epic Campers valid reviews is 99.44% and is based on 89 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Lubos Tomsovsky||10/10||23 days||99.92||100%|
|Emily Aras||10/10||23 days||99.92||100%|
|Markus Tanner||10/10||54 days||99.54||99%|
|Elyssa Quinton||10/10||54 days||99.54||99%|
|Roland & Julie Azor||10/10||85 days||98.86||98%|
|Connor & Natalia||10/10||85 days||98.86||98%|
|Lorna Ferlisi||10/10||85 days||98.86||98%|
|joel dawson||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Patrick and Linda||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|George Pye||9/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Roman Parak||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Emil Halvorsrud||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Evan Reesor||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Yacob Kial||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Jennifer Morris||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Budd Nicholson||10/10||115 days||97.9||97%|
|Francis Beaudet||10/10||145 days||96.67||95%|
|Camila & Cory||10/10||146 days||96.62||95%|
|Maarten Mullens||10/10||146 days||96.62||95%|
|Sander Palmqvist||10/10||146 days||96.62||95%|
|Jemima and Sam||10/10||237 days||91.1||86%|
|Léa & Manu||10/10||237 days||91.1||86%|
|ellie booker||10/10||237 days||91.1||86%|
|Elise Billings||9/10||267 days||88.7||82%|
|Orielle Rowlands||10/10||298 days||85.93||77%|
|Steven McBain||10/10||328 days||82.95||72%|
|Francisca Muller||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Aaron and Jesse from Canada||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Thibaut LE LOC'H||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Kelly Ventress||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Matt Thomas||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Dessi Zaharieva||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Jessica Burke||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Alexander Kelly||10/10||329 days||82.85||72%|
|Jeff Mann||9/10||359 days||79.58||67%|
|Jenna Collins||10/10||359 days||79.58||67%|
|Judy Thomas||10/10||360 days||79.46||66%|
|Alecia and Jasper||10/10||360 days||79.46||66%|
|Anita & Rudy||10/10||360 days||79.46||66%|
|Janelle and Dominic||10/10||388 days||76.14||61%|
|Deb P.||10/10||388 days||76.14||61%|
|Mary morgan||10/10||388 days||76.14||61%|
|Lilla Goeser||10/10||388 days||76.14||61%|
|emma hayden||10/10||388 days||76.14||61%|
|Richard Yates||10/10||419 days||72.18||54%|
|Caitriona & Gareth||10/10||419 days||72.18||54%|
|Emma Collings||10/10||419 days||72.18||54%|
|Robin Mathieson||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Bob C||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Dee Greig-Dunn||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Daniel & Krissy||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Reinhold Rittinger||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Peter Dovey||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Judith Marsman||9/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Jaimy Louwaars||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Helen Knight||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Megan Miller||10/10||450 days||67.91||47%|
|Emanuela Ciupe||10/10||480 days||63.49||40%|
|Thomas Gerz||10/10||480 days||63.49||40%|
|Dan Larkin||10/10||571 days||48.51||16%|
|Zach Groves||10/10||602 days||43.51||7%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Epic Campers does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.