Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mad Campers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
62 Valid Reviews
The Mad Campers experience has a total of 66 reviews. There are 62 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 62 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mad Campers valid reviews is 96.77% and is based on 62 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Kat Suddaby||10/10||25 days||99.9||100%|
|Alexander Ruhland||10/10||56 days||99.5||100%|
|Silvere VERACRUZ||8/10||56 days||94.53||95%|
|Lizzie Lacey-Brennan||9/10||87 days||98.8||99%|
|Jonas Gemmel||10/10||87 days||98.8||99%|
|Valerie LaCrosse||10/10||117 days||97.83||98%|
|Laura Collins||10/10||178 days||94.98||95%|
|Amandine CHATAIN||9/10||209 days||93.08||93%|
|Justine Senée||9/10||209 days||93.08||93%|
|Indra Prasetyo||10/10||301 days||85.64||86%|
|SCOTT HASSLER||9/10||301 days||85.64||86%|
|Summer Peterman||10/10||301 days||85.64||86%|
|Lorrie Kaplan||10/10||331 days||82.64||83%|
|Stephanie Hill||10/10||331 days||82.64||83%|
|Will Johnson||10/10||331 days||82.64||83%|
|Bob Bergman||10/10||362 days||79.23||79%|
|Milena Tkotz||10/10||362 days||79.23||79%|
|William Nash||10/10||362 days||79.23||79%|
|Alan Whitlock||10/10||362 days||79.23||79%|
|Sean Seguin||10/10||390 days||75.9||76%|
|Chris Bollington||8/10||390 days||72.1||72%|
|Sam Atkins||10/10||390 days||75.9||76%|
|Laura Morley||10/10||421 days||71.91||72%|
|Kristen Rodgers||10/10||421 days||71.91||72%|
|fabien Lafond||9/10||421 days||71.91||72%|
|Matthijs de Jong||10/10||421 days||71.91||72%|
|Caroline Creekman||10/10||452 days||67.63||68%|
|Julie Robinson||10/10||452 days||67.63||68%|
|William Swann||10/10||452 days||67.63||68%|
|Catherine Henry||10/10||452 days||67.63||68%|
|Richard Arnot||10/10||482 days||63.19||63%|
|Tety Kusuma Wardani Tety||9/10||482 days||63.19||63%|
|Benjamin Becker||10/10||482 days||63.19||63%|
|Marieke & Wieteke||10/10||513 days||58.3||58%|
|Nurrin Akhyar Nurrinanuwar||9/10||543 days||53.28||53%|
|James Campos||10/10||574 days||48.01||48%|
|Fernando & Andrea||9/10||574 days||48.01||48%|
|Andrew Korson||10/10||605 days||43.05||43%|
|jarren Verbeek||10/10||635 days||38.53||39%|
|Hamish Wedd||8/10||696 days||28.72||29%|
|María Casanova||10/10||696 days||30.23||30%|
|Janine Shaw||10/10||727 days||26.46||26%|
|Maria Sol Fresard Disselkoen||10/10||727 days||26.46||26%|
|Sandi Fukumoto||10/10||755 days||23.32||23%|
|Theo and Rachel||10/10||755 days||23.32||23%|
|Peter & Vicki||10/10||755 days||23.32||23%|
|Stefano Muratore||10/10||755 days||23.32||23%|
|Rick Karsten||10/10||786 days||20.13||20%|
|Joel McDowell||10/10||786 days||20.13||20%|
|Rogier van Hei||8/10||786 days||19.12||19%|
|Hayley Diakiw||9/10||847 days||14.75||15%|
|LIZ WATKINS||9/10||847 days||14.75||15%|
|Olli-Pekka Heinimäki||10/10||847 days||14.75||15%|
|Sam Pillidge||10/10||908 days||10.54||11%|
|Jason Longhos||10/10||908 days||10.54||11%|
|Charles E Wilber||9/10||4104 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mad Campers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner. There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days.
The Mad Campers experience has 4 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Mad Campers experience has been adjusted for 4 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.