Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
67 Valid Reviews
The Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park experience has a total of 69 reviews. There are 67 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park valid reviews is 88.36% and is based on 67 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 67 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park face-to-face reviews is 89.18% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Gerry Boobis||6/10||1196 days||3.99||10%|
|Tobi Guga||10/10||1263 days||4.67||12%|
|Nancy Blindell||10/10||1582 days||4.05||10%|
|Diego Pablos||10/10||1702 days||3.81||9%|
|Anssens Weber Florie Brian||9/10||1713 days||3.79||9%|
|Ixtaso Roncal||9/10||1747 days||3.72||9%|
|Coralie Ambrosino||7/10||1976 days||2.98||6%|
|Tarillon Family||9/10||1979 days||3.27||7%|
|David McIntosh||8/10||2024 days||3.02||6%|
|Dawn Mulligan||9/10||2030 days||3.17||7%|
|Oliver Andres||9/10||2063 days||3.11||7%|
|Corinna Fallenbuchel||10/10||2064 days||3.1||7%|
|Fanny DeBon||9/10||2077 days||3.08||6%|
|Logan Leduc||9/10||2085 days||3.06||6%|
|Anna Grafenstein||8/10||2319 days||2.47||4%|
|Caroline Hennache||8/10||2322 days||2.47||4%|
|isabel Zander||10/10||2322 days||2.6||5%|
|Calvin Becker||10/10||2322 days||2.6||5%|
|Karen Garvin||10/10||2324 days||2.59||5%|
|Julien Joubert-Gaillard||7/10||2326 days||2.36||4%|
|Marek Heiurich||10/10||2332 days||2.58||5%|
|Linda Wainman||9/10||2351 days||2.54||5%|
|Chris Wainman||9/10||2351 days||2.54||5%|
|Ruud Biemans||7/10||2354 days||2.31||4%|
|Sarah Christman||8/10||2356 days||2.41||4%|
|Stina Hultberg||10/10||2358 days||2.53||5%|
|Denise Ewbank||9/10||2369 days||2.51||4%|
|Marius Hoffmann||8/10||2371 days||2.38||4%|
|Ene Pold||9/10||2376 days||2.49||4%|
|Henrik Suefke||10/10||2376 days||2.49||4%|
|G Ballard||10/10||2380 days||2.49||4%|
|F Ballard||9/10||2380 days||2.49||4%|
|Timothee Serres||9/10||2384 days||2.48||4%|
|Wouter Bosch||7/10||2395 days||2.23||3%|
|Claire Lieval||9/10||2401 days||2.44||4%|
|Guy David||10/10||2403 days||2.44||4%|
|Sarah Strong||10/10||2406 days||2.43||4%|
|Michael Rohn||10/10||2410 days||2.43||4%|
|Cornelia Stark||10/10||2410 days||2.43||4%|
|Thomas Roche||9/10||2415 days||2.42||4%|
|Marc Greeve||10/10||2421 days||2.41||4%|
|Christin Woelk||10/10||2683 days||1.89||2%|
|Sven Woelk||10/10||2683 days||1.89||2%|
|Audrey Ripoche||7/10||2695 days||1.7||2%|
|Kiki Wykstra||10/10||2707 days||1.85||2%|
|Enna Keet||8/10||2731 days||1.71||2%|
|Katharina Littlemann||10/10||2731 days||1.8||2%|
|Veronica and Jordi||9/10||2738 days||1.78||2%|
|Fraser Goldsmith||10/10||2743 days||1.77||2%|
|Jeanne Moustier||10/10||2760 days||1.74||2%|
|Mathieu Brias||8/10||2765 days||1.65||1%|
|Natalie Nubler||3/10||2801 days||1.28||0%|
|Stefan and Brigit and Janek||10/10||2801 days||1.66||1%|
|Oliver Kalmbach||8/10||2818 days||1.55||1%|
|Karsten Meyer||5/10||2824 days||1.31||0%|
|Kali Lohman||9/10||2825 days||1.61||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.