Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coromandel Walkway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
34 Valid Reviews
The Coromandel Walkway experience has a total of 34 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coromandel Walkway valid reviews is 85.29% and is based on 34 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
29 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 34 valid reviews, the experience has 29 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 29 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coromandel Walkway face-to-face reviews is 84.48% and is based on 29 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Linnea Sahlberg||8/10||896 days||10.71||100%|
|Claudia Schaefer||9/10||1200 days||4.79||45%|
|Christopher Emerich||9/10||1200 days||4.79||45%|
|Sophie Rosenberg||10/10||1462 days||4.28||40%|
|Antonia Gillett||8/10||1482 days||4.03||38%|
|Julie Duvert||9/10||1486 days||4.23||40%|
|Quentin Sauve||8/10||1493 days||4.01||37%|
|Patrick Baritz||8/10||1527 days||3.95||37%|
|Adam Taylor||10/10||1533 days||4.14||39%|
|renee verwey||9/10||1537 days||4.14||39%|
|Linda and Gunther||8/10||1566 days||3.87||36%|
|Sebastian Schurchardt||9/10||1569 days||4.07||38%|
|Jakob Gerber||10/10||1583 days||4.05||38%|
|Jurgen Moors||8/10||1952 days||3.16||29%|
|James Russell||7/10||2199 days||2.58||24%|
|Hannah Watt||8/10||2199 days||2.7||25%|
|Mark Hofmann||9/10||2229 days||2.78||26%|
|Charles Busnel||9/10||2289 days||2.66||25%|
|Cloarec Guillaume||10/10||2583 days||2.09||19%|
|Jan & Jile||10/10||2593 days||2.07||19%|
|Mike & Suzann||9/10||2964 days||1.34||13%|
|Russell Eames||8/10||2965 days||1.27||12%|
|Ursi Meier||5/10||2976 days||1.07||10%|
|Bart Goovaerts||8/10||3060 days||1.1||10%|
|Lillian van Wegen||8/10||3307 days||0.64||6%|
|Marianne Wheatley||9/10||3307 days||0.67||6%|
|Hansjoerg Ehrmann||8/10||3785 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Coromandel Walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.