Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

56 Valid Reviews

The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 56 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 56 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 39
70%
9/10 10
18%
8/10 4
7%
7/10 2
4%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

94.29% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 94.29% and is based on 56 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

6 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 56 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 3
50%
9/10 1
17%
8/10 2
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.55%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Karen and Eric 10/10 29 days 99.87 100%
Meryl D 8/10 29 days 94.87 95%
Merle Bray, Elizabeth Watson & Bella 9/10 58 days 99.47 100%
Ian Campbell 10/10 89 days 98.74 99%
Andrew Bethell 9/10 89 days 98.74 99%
Johannes 10/10 120 days 97.72 98%
Dieter Giesen 10/10 120 days 97.72 98%
Neal Rastrick 10/10 150 days 96.43 97%
Mike Taylor 10/10 150 days 96.43 97%
Truds/ Shaun McGregor 10/10 242 days 90.72 91%
Rachael 10/10 273 days 88.19 88%
Tarina McKenzie 10/10 273 days 88.19 88%
Dianne Wade 10/10 303 days 85.45 86%
Cliff & Tracey 10/10 303 days 85.45 86%
Beth 10/10 364 days 79.0 79%
Liz 10/10 364 days 79.0 79%
Paul Smith 8/10 423 days 68.06 68%
Alan & Lesley Ball 9/10 423 days 71.65 72%
John Zoetebier 2/10 454 days 50.5 51%
phil smith 9/10 454 days 67.34 67%
Anne & John 10/10 607 days 42.74 43%
Chris&Kevin Rush 10/10 699 days 29.85 30%
Paul and Nat Wright 10/10 729 days 26.23 26%
Dan Kilkelly 10/10 729 days 26.23 26%
John Curries 10/10 760 days 22.78 23%
Trish & Ian 10/10 760 days 22.78 23%
Jenny Sullivan 10/10 760 days 22.78 23%
Tina and Terry 9/10 788 days 19.93 20%
Katie Wiffin 10/10 818 days 17.16 17%
kay henderson 10/10 818 days 17.16 17%
Phil and Dianne Neal 9/10 820 days 16.98 17%
Leith Milson 10/10 879 days 12.39 12%
John Peddie 10/10 1458 days 4.29 4%
York Tüchelmann 10/10 1484 days 4.24 4%
Liz Peters 10/10 1489 days 4.23 4%
Shelley Martin 10/10 1518 days 4.17 4%
Debbie Thomas 10/10 1549 days 4.11 4%
Hana Rachfalik 10/10 1569 days 4.07 4%
Sheriden Derby 10/10 1824 days 3.57 4%
Trevor Brown 9/10 1907 days 3.41 3%
BernardB 10/10 1914 days 3.4 3%
Jason 9/10 1914 days 3.4 3%
Ray 10/10 2113 days true 3.01 3%
C&P Macwhippy 9/10 2190 days 2.86 3%
Daisy Shasta 10/10 2228 days true 2.78 3%
Rita Hochstiasser 9/10 2246 days true 2.75 3%
Jacqui V 7/10 2249 days 2.49 2%
Brendan K 10/10 2249 days 2.74 3%
E and C Tipuna 10/10 2279 days 2.68 3%
Jenny Hall 7/10 2311 days 2.38 2%
Tracie Thornborough 10/10 2311 days 2.62 3%
justin butler 10/10 2311 days 2.62 3%
Mick McIvor 10/10 2402 days 2.44 2%
E Smudde 8/10 2964 days true 1.28 1%
Eric & Liz McKean 10/10 3299 days true 0.69 1%
Pieter Middeldorp 8/10 3678 days true 0.0 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.04% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.

The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 2 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
0 -0.00%
1 -0.02%
2 -0.04%
3 -0.06%
4 -0.08%
5 -0.10%

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.